Nyamathi A M, Leake B, Flaskerud J, Lewis C, Bennett C
School of Nursing, University of California, Los Angeles 90024-6918.
Res Nurs Health. 1993 Feb;16(1):11-21. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770160104.
The efficacy and differential effects of specialized (S) and traditional (T) AIDS education programs on cognitive, behavioral, and psychological outcomes were investigated. The sample consisted of 858 impoverished African-American and Latina women (S = 448, T = 410). At baseline, women in the traditional group reported significantly higher distress, greater knowledge of AIDS, and less problem-focused coping. Significant improvements over the 2-week intervention interval were found for participants of both AIDS education programs for appraisal of threat, concerns, knowledge, and attitudes about AIDS, emotion-focused coping, number of sexual partners, IV and non-IV drug use, depression, and distress. However, multivariate analysis indicated that the traditional group had slightly better posttest scores on concerns, emotion-focused coping, knowledge of AIDS, and number of partners than the specialized group. The specialized group reported greater use of problem-focused coping. These differences do not detract from the substantial improvement found for both groups, but they do reinforce the conclusion that the specialized program was not more effective than its standard counterpart.
研究了专门的(S)和传统的(T)艾滋病教育项目对认知、行为和心理结果的疗效及差异影响。样本包括858名贫困非裔美国和拉丁裔女性(S组 = 448人,T组 = 410人)。在基线时,传统组的女性报告有更高的痛苦程度、更多的艾滋病知识以及更少的以问题为中心的应对方式。在为期2周的干预期间,两个艾滋病教育项目的参与者在对艾滋病的威胁评估、担忧、知识和态度、以情绪为中心的应对方式、性伴侣数量、静脉注射和非静脉注射吸毒、抑郁和痛苦等方面均有显著改善。然而,多变量分析表明,传统组在担忧、以情绪为中心的应对方式、艾滋病知识和伴侣数量方面的后测分数略高于专门组。专门组报告更多地使用以问题为中心的应对方式。这些差异并不影响两组都取得的显著改善,但确实强化了这样一个结论,即专门项目并不比其标准对应项目更有效。