• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[腹腔镜胆囊切除术:50例未经过筛选的外科手术患者的早期结果]

[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early results in the initial non-selected group of 50 surgical patients].

作者信息

Jurka M, Riebel O, Leypold J, Skricka T, Piskac P, Kala Z, Kleinbauer A

机构信息

II. chirurgická klinika FN u sv. Anny, Brno.

出版信息

Rozhl Chir. 1993 Jan;72(1):8-12.

PMID:8488428
Abstract

Early results of an initial non-selected group of 50 laparoscopic cholecystectomies (mean hospitalization 3.5 days, 6% conversions, no serious complications, no revisions, morbidity due to minor complications 6.3% and saved costs of postoperative hospital treatment 44.6%) confirm that this operation is feasible, safe, preferred by patients and well tolerated economical definitive treatment of cholecystolithiasis. On these grounds it is becoming a method of first choice. The safety of patients is ensured by steady care of the surgeon and his adequate training according to generally accepted principles.

摘要

对最初50例未经挑选的腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的早期结果(平均住院时间3.5天,6%中转开腹,无严重并发症,无再次手术,轻微并发症导致的发病率为6.3%,术后住院治疗节省费用44.6%)证实,该手术对于胆囊结石来说是可行、安全、受患者青睐且耐受性良好的经济有效的确定性治疗方法。基于这些理由,它正成为首选方法。通过外科医生的持续关注以及其根据普遍接受的原则进行的充分培训,确保了患者的安全。

相似文献

1
[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early results in the initial non-selected group of 50 surgical patients].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术:50例未经过筛选的外科手术患者的早期结果]
Rozhl Chir. 1993 Jan;72(1):8-12.
2
Safety, efficacy, cost, and morbidity of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis of 228 consecutive patients.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术的安全性、有效性、成本及发病率:对228例连续患者的前瞻性分析
Am Surg. 1993 Jan;59(1):23-7.
3
[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classical cholecystectomy].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统胆囊切除术]
Bratisl Lek Listy. 1996 Apr;97(4):220-3.
4
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy by ultrasonic dissection without cystic duct and artery ligature.不结扎胆囊管和胆囊动脉的超声刀腹腔镜胆囊切除术
Surg Endosc. 2003 Mar;17(3):442-51. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9068-3. Epub 2002 Oct 29.
5
Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis with cholecystolithiasis.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎的时机
Hepatogastroenterology. 2004 Mar-Apr;51(56):346-8.
6
[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective study of 1,775 unselected patients].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术:对1775例未经筛选患者的前瞻性研究]
Zentralbl Chir. 1995;120(5):353-9.
7
[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2007 Aug;23(134):92-4.
8
[Is cholecystectomy by celiovideoscopy dangerous in the initial period? Prospective study of 100 initial cases].
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1992;16(11):875-8.
9
Results of the first 100 single port laparoscopic cholecystectomies in a secondary care hospital.二级护理医院中前100例单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的结果。
Cir Esp. 2014 May;92(5):324-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2013.03.014. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
10
[Conventional or laparoscopic cholecystectomy in treatment of acute cholecystitis?].[传统开腹胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的比较?]
Chirurg. 1994 Dec;65(12):1121-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Is male gender a risk factor for conversion of laparoscopic into open cholecystectomy?男性性别是腹腔镜胆囊切除术转为开腹胆囊切除术的危险因素吗?
Surg Endosc. 1996 Sep;10(9):892-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00188477.