• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血小板单采术:两种血液成分分离系统在血小板产量、处理时间和白细胞含量方面的比较

Plateletpheresis: comparison of platelet yields, processing time, and white cell content with two apheresis systems.

作者信息

Burgstaler E A, Pineda A A, Brecher M A

机构信息

Section of Transfusion Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

Transfusion. 1993 May;33(5):393-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1993.33593255599.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1537-2995.1993.33593255599.x
PMID:8488542
Abstract

Two apheresis systems (COBE Spectra and Fenwal CS-3000 Plus with TNX-6 chamber [CS-3000 Plus]) were compared by using their yield predictors and maximum processing times in regard to platelet yields and processing times (n = 200 each). Platelet yields (n = 50 each) and white cell (WBC) content (n = 20 each) from procedures using the current software revision (3.6) on the Spectra and various interface offset (IO) settings on the CS-3000 Plus were also compared. Significantly higher median platelet yields (4.88 [range, 1.84-9.97] vs. 4.57 [range, 2.82-9.20] x 10(11) platelets) and frequency of components with > or = 6.0 x 10(11) platelets (31.5 vs. 21.5%) were found with the Spectra. In the study with Spectra and the CS-3000 Plus IO settings, IO-10 and IO-13, overall, produced the most platelets, although the differences were not significant. All Spectra collections tested had < 5 x 10(8) WBCs, and, depending on the software revision, had either 85 percent (revision 3.6) or 100 percent (revision 2.5) of components with < 5 x 10(6) WBCs. To ensure that 100 percent of components contained < 5 x 10(8) WBCs when the CS-3000 Plus was used, IO settings of 10 or less were required, and to ensure components with < 5 x 10(6) WBCs, only IO-6 could be used. Spectra and CS-3000 Plus were capable of collecting large doses of platelets (up to the equivalent of 18 units) in processing times of 67 to 100 minutes with < 5 x 10(6) WBCs.

摘要

通过使用血小板产量预测器和最大处理时间,对两种单采系统(COBE Spectra和配备TNX - 6腔室的Fenwal CS - 3000 Plus [CS - 3000 Plus])在血小板产量和处理时间方面进行了比较(每种系统n = 200)。还比较了使用Spectra当前软件版本(3.6)的程序以及CS - 3000 Plus上各种接口偏移(IO)设置下的血小板产量(每种n = 50)和白细胞(WBC)含量(每种n = 20)。发现Spectra的中位数血小板产量显著更高(4.88 [范围,1.84 - 9.97] 对 4.57 [范围,2.82 - 9.20]×10¹¹个血小板),且血小板数≥6.0×10¹¹个的成分频率更高(31.5% 对 21.5%)。在Spectra和CS - 3000 Plus的IO设置(IO - 10和IO - 13)的研究中,总体上产生的血小板最多,尽管差异不显著。所有测试的Spectra采集物的白细胞数均<5×10⁸,并且根据软件版本,白细胞数<5×10⁶的成分占85%(版本3.6)或100%(版本2.5)。当使用CS - 3000 Plus时,为确保100%的成分白细胞数<5×10⁸,需要IO设置为10或更低,而要确保白细胞数<5×10⁶的成分,只能使用IO - 6。Spectra和CS - 3000 Plus能够在67至100分钟的处理时间内采集大量血小板(相当于18个单位),且白细胞数<5×10⁶。

相似文献

1
Plateletpheresis: comparison of platelet yields, processing time, and white cell content with two apheresis systems.血小板单采术:两种血液成分分离系统在血小板产量、处理时间和白细胞含量方面的比较
Transfusion. 1993 May;33(5):393-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1993.33593255599.x.
2
Plateletapheresis: comparison of processing times, platelet yields, and white blood cell content with several commonly used systems.
J Clin Apher. 1997;12(4):170-8. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-1101(1997)12:4<170::aid-jca3>3.0.co;2-7.
3
Comparison of plateletpheresis with a standard and an improved collection device.
Transfusion. 1993 Oct;33(10):835-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1993.331094054621.x.
4
Comparison of plateletpheresis using two cell separators and identical donors.
Transfusion. 1989 Jul-Aug;29(6):521-3. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1989.29689318451.x.
5
WBC subset analysis of WBC-reduced platelet components.
Transfusion. 2000 Jul;40(7):771-80. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2000.40070771.x.
6
Improved removal of white cells with minimal platelet loss by filtration of apheresis platelets during collection.
Transfusion. 1999 Jan;39(1):74-82. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1999.39199116898.x.
7
Plateletapheresis with a next generation blood cell separator.
J Clin Apher. 1997;12(2):55-62. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-1101(1997)12:2<55::aid-jca1>3.0.co;2-8.
8
Evaluation of the Amicus Separator in the collection of apheresis platelets.
Transfusion. 1998 Sep;38(9):848-54. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1998.38998409005.x.
9
White cell reduction during plateletpheresis: a comparison of three blood cell separators.
Transfusion. 1999 Jun;39(6):572-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1999.39060572.x.
10
Comparison of COBE white cell-reduction and standard plateletpheresis protocols in the same donors.
Transfusion. 1997 Oct;37(10):1045-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1997.371098016443.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius Com.Tec Cell Separators.费恩沃尔阿米库斯血细胞分离机和费森尤斯Com.Tec细胞分离机上血小板单采术的比较
Transfus Med Hemother. 2008;35(5):368-373. doi: 10.1159/000151351. Epub 2008 Sep 16.
2
Quality assessment of platelet concentrates prepared by platelet rich plasma-platelet concentrate, buffy coat poor-platelet concentrate (BC-PC) and apheresis-PC methods.通过富血小板血浆-血小板浓缩物、少白细胞层-血小板浓缩物(BC-PC)和单采血小板浓缩物方法制备的血小板浓缩物的质量评估。
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2009 Jul;3(2):86-94. doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.53882.
3
Pre- and post- donation haematological values in healthy donors undergoing plateletpheresis with five different systems.
使用五种不同系统进行血小板单采的健康献血者献血前后的血液学指标。
Blood Transfus. 2009 Jul;7(3):188-92. doi: 10.2450/2009.0064-08.