Suppr超能文献

院外心脏骤停的代表性生存率是多少?来自康涅狄格州纽黑文市的经验见解。

What are representative survival rates for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? Insights from the New Haven (Conn) experience.

作者信息

Solomon N A

机构信息

Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 1993 May 24;153(10):1218-21.

PMID:8494474
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Survival rates from out-of-hospital cardiac arrests due to ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia vary greatly. The majority of published reports indicate a survival range from 11% to 33%, depending on the area of observation. Two recent series from major metropolitan centers describe markedly less favorable outcomes and have led to speculation that dense urbanization may contribute to worse outcomes.

METHODS

Examination of a consecutive series of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in New Haven, Conn, a city of 127,000 people and 55 km2 with a two-tiered emergency response system. All cases of nontraumatic cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia occurring outside of a hospital between January 1988 and June 1989 were considered. That city's emergency medical system employs emergency medical technicians and paramedics. Standard resuscitation techniques were employed; high-dose epinephrine and interposed abdominal counterpulsations were not routine interventions. The main outcome measure was survival to hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Three (4.0%) of 75 patients survived cardiac arrest and were discharged alive from the hospital. Two (5.3%) of 38 witnessed arrests resulted in hospital discharges. Patient demographics were typical of those reported from other cities that have published outcomes data. Few patients (16%) received bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

CONCLUSION

There is increasing evidence that previously recognized standards for resuscitation success may not be present in certain types of municipalities, including this northeastern city. A registry of outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrests would help to clarify the true national experience.

摘要

背景

因室颤或无脉性室性心动过速导致的院外心脏骤停患者的生存率差异很大。大多数已发表的报告显示,根据观察区域的不同,生存率在11%至33%之间。最近来自主要大都市中心的两个系列研究描述了明显不太乐观的结果,并引发了一种猜测,即密集的城市化可能导致更差的结果。

方法

对康涅狄格州纽黑文市一系列连续的院外心脏骤停病例进行研究,该市人口12.7万,面积55平方公里,有两级应急响应系统。纳入1988年1月至1989年6月期间在医院外发生的所有因室颤或无脉性室性心动过速导致的非创伤性心脏骤停病例。该市的紧急医疗系统雇佣了急救医疗技术员和护理人员。采用标准的复苏技术;大剂量肾上腺素和置入式腹部反搏不是常规干预措施。主要结局指标是存活至出院。

结果

75例心脏骤停患者中有3例(4.0%)存活并出院。38例有目击者的心脏骤停患者中有2例(5.3%)存活至出院。患者人口统计学特征与其他公布了结局数据的城市所报告的典型特征相符。很少有患者(16%)接受旁观者发起的心肺复苏。

结论

越来越多的证据表明,包括这座东北部城市在内的某些类型的城市可能不存在先前公认的复苏成功标准。建立院外心脏骤停结局登记册将有助于明确全国的真实情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验