Suppr超能文献

先天性色觉缺陷的筛查。大隈板和石原板的比较。

Screening for congenital colour vision defects. A comparison between the Ohkuma and Ishihara plates.

作者信息

Littlewood R, Hyde F

机构信息

Mount Medical Centre, Perth, Western Australia.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1993 Feb;21(1):31-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.1993.tb00127.x.

Abstract

A prospective comparison between the Ohkuma and Ishihara pseudoisochromatic (PIC) plates was carried out in a group of 400 patients attending a general ophthalmology practice. The sensitivity of the Ohkuma test was compared to the Ishihara test, and the specificity of both was determined by reference to anomaloscopy as a gold standard. Both tests correctly identified the same group of 24 patients as having a red/green confusion axis, and the Ohkuma test was equally as sensitive as the Ishihara. The grading plates in both tests are unreliable, but the Ohkuma test is quicker, easier to administer, gives less ambiguous responses and has a clearer cut-off score for abnormality. On the basis of this experience the Ohkuma test is recommended as more appropriate for routine colour vision screening than either the 24 or 38 plate Ishihara tests.

摘要

对400名到普通眼科门诊就诊的患者进行了大久保和石原假同色(PIC)板的前瞻性比较。将大久保测试的敏感性与石原测试进行比较,并以检眼镜检查作为金标准来确定两者的特异性。两种测试都正确地将同一组24名患者识别为具有红/绿混淆轴,并且大久保测试与石原测试的敏感性相同。两种测试中的分级板都不可靠,但大久保测试更快、更易于实施、给出的反应不那么模糊,并且有更明确的异常截止分数。基于这一经验,推荐大久保测试比24板或38板石原测试更适合用于常规色觉筛查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验