Suppr超能文献

两种印刷式假同色觉测验在颜色视觉评估中的比较。

Comparison of Two Printed Pseudoisochromatic Tests for Color Vision Assessment.

出版信息

Optom Vis Sci. 2023 Dec 1;100(12):840-846. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000002087. Epub 2023 Nov 27.

Abstract

SIGNIFICANCE

The Waggoner PIP24 is a pseudoisochromatic test with a pattern similar to the Ishihara test. This study determined that the W-PIP24 can be used clinically to yield screening results (or sensitivity and specificity) comparable with the Ishihara.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine whether the W-PIP24 is equivalent to the Ishihara 38 edition pseudoisochromatic test in detecting red-green color vision defects. Also, the performance of each plate of the W-PIP24 in detecting the color vision defects relative to the Ishihara test was determined.

METHODS

Sixty-three individuals with congenital red-green color vision defects and 57 with normal trichromacy were recruited. Participants were tested with both the Ishihara and W-PIP24. The first-order agreement coefficients were calculated for the Ishihara and W-PIP24. The results were also analyzed using specificity, sensitivity, efficiency, and predictive pass and fail values.

RESULTS

The agreement between the W-PIP24 and Ishihara test using the recommended criterion of using all plates was perfect. The sensitivity, specificity, predictive pass, and predictive fail were 1.00 (95% confidence interval, 0.94 to 1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the W-PIP24 using a failure criterion of three or more errors on screening plates 1 to 15 is equivalent to the Ishihara test while screening for red-green color vision deficiency using a failure criterion of three or more errors on screening plates 1 to 17 of the Ishihara 38 edition.

摘要

意义

Waggoner PIP24 是一种假同色图测试,其图案与石原测试相似。本研究确定 W-PIP24 可在临床上用于产生与石原测试相当的筛查结果(或敏感性和特异性)。

目的

本研究旨在确定 W-PIP24 是否等同于石原 38 版假同色测试,用于检测红绿色觉缺陷。此外,还确定了 W-PIP24 每个盘子相对于石原测试检测色觉缺陷的性能。

方法

招募了 63 名先天性红绿色觉缺陷患者和 57 名正常三色觉患者。参与者接受了石原和 W-PIP24 测试。计算了石原和 W-PIP24 的一阶一致性系数。还使用特异性、敏感性、效率以及预测通过和失败值对结果进行了分析。

结果

使用所有盘子的推荐标准,W-PIP24 和石原测试之间的一致性是完美的。敏感性、特异性、预测通过率和预测失败率均为 1.00(95%置信区间,0.94 至 1.00)。

结论

本研究表明,使用 W-PIP24 的筛选盘 1 到 15 的错误数达到 3 个或以上的失败标准等同于石原测试,而使用石原 38 版的筛选盘 1 到 17 的错误数达到 3 个或以上的失败标准来筛查红绿色觉缺陷也是如此。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验