MacVicar J, Dobbie G, Owen-Johnstone L, Jagger C, Hopkins M, Kennedy J
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Leicester Royal Infirmary, UK.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993 Apr;100(4):316-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb12972.x.
To compare the outcome of two methods of maternity care during the antenatal period and at delivery. One was to be midwife-led for both antenatal care and delivery, the latter taking place in rooms similar to those in one's own home to simulate home confinement. The other would be consultant-led with the mothers labouring in the delivery suite rooms with resuscitation equipment for both mother and baby in evidence, monitors present and a delivery bed on which both anaesthetic and obstetric procedures could be easily and safely carried out.
Randomised controlled trial.
Leicester Royal Infirmary Maternity Hospital.
Of 3510 women who were randomised, 2304 were assigned to the midwife-led scheme and 1206 were assigned to the consultant-led scheme.
Complications in the antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum periods were compared as was maternal morbidity and fetal mortality and morbidity. Satisfaction of the women with care over different periods of the pregnancy and birth were assessed.
There were few significant differences in antepartum, intrapartum and postpartum events between the two groups. There was no difference in the percentage of mothers and babies discharged home alive and well. Generally higher levels of satisfaction with care antenatally and during labour and delivery were shown in those women allocated to midwife care.
比较两种产前及分娩期护理方法的效果。一种是由助产士主导产前护理及分娩过程,分娩在类似于自家房间的环境中进行,以模拟家庭分娩环境。另一种是由顾问医生主导,产妇在产房分娩,产房内有母婴复苏设备、监护仪,还有一张便于安全实施麻醉和产科操作的产床。
随机对照试验。
莱斯特皇家医院妇产科。
3510名随机分组的女性中,2304人被分配到助产士主导方案组,1206人被分配到顾问医生主导方案组。
比较产前、产时及产后并发症,以及孕产妇发病率、胎儿死亡率和发病率。评估女性在孕期及分娩不同阶段对护理的满意度。
两组在产前、产时及产后事件方面几乎没有显著差异。母婴平安出院的比例没有差异。总体而言,分配到助产士护理组的女性在产前、分娩时对护理的满意度更高。