• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项在澳大利亚阿德莱德进行的比较分娩中心护理与产房护理的随机对照试验。

A randomised controlled trial comparing birthing centre care with delivery suite care in Adelaide, Australia.

作者信息

Byrne J P, Crowther C A, Moss J R

机构信息

Queen Victoria Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000 Aug;40(3):268-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.2000.tb03333.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1479-828x.2000.tb03333.x
PMID:11065032
Abstract

Birthing centre care offers women with a low risk of complication in pregnancy an alternative to conventional care for the birthing of their baby. It is important these two forms of care are appropriately assessed. A randomised controlled trial comparing the newly opened birthing centre with the established conventional delivery suite was conducted at the then Queen Victoria Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia. The outcomes measured included maternal satisfaction, costs and clinical outcomes both for mother and baby which related to the need for Caesarean section, episiotomy or tear rate and method of feeding. Two hundred and one women attending the hospital's antenatal clinic were randomly allocated to either birthing centre or delivery suite care. One hundred women were allocated to the birthing centre. No differences were found in either group related to clinical outcomes or costs. The only difference in maternal satisfaction was the choice women made for their next birth. More women in the birthing centre group felt they were encouraged to breastfeed immediately after birth. While the numbers in this study were too small to detect any but large differences in outcome, birthing centre care should remain an option for women and further studies undertaken with larger numbers.

摘要

分娩中心护理为孕期并发症风险较低的女性提供了一种替代传统护理的分娩方式。对这两种护理形式进行恰当评估很重要。在当时位于南澳大利亚阿德莱德的维多利亚女王医院,开展了一项随机对照试验,将新开设的分娩中心与已有的传统分娩套房进行比较。所测量的结果包括产妇满意度、成本以及母婴的临床结果,这些结果与剖宫产需求、会阴切开术或撕裂率以及喂养方式有关。201名到医院产前门诊就诊的女性被随机分配到分娩中心护理组或分娩套房护理组。100名女性被分配到分娩中心护理组。两组在临床结果或成本方面均未发现差异。产妇满意度方面的唯一差异在于女性对下次分娩的选择。分娩中心护理组中更多女性觉得她们在产后立即得到了母乳喂养的鼓励。虽然本研究中的样本数量太小,除了较大的结果差异外无法检测到其他差异,但分娩中心护理仍应作为女性的一种选择,并应开展更大规模的进一步研究。

相似文献

1
A randomised controlled trial comparing birthing centre care with delivery suite care in Adelaide, Australia.一项在澳大利亚阿德莱德进行的比较分娩中心护理与产房护理的随机对照试验。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000 Aug;40(3):268-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.2000.tb03333.x.
2
Birth centre or labour ward? A comparison of the clinical outcomes of low-risk women in a NSW hospital.分娩中心还是产房?新南威尔士州一家医院低风险产妇临床结局比较
Aust J Adv Nurs. 2000 Sep-Nov;18(1):8-12.
3
Simulated home delivery in hospital: a randomised controlled trial.医院模拟家庭分娩:一项随机对照试验。
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993 Apr;100(4):316-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb12972.x.
4
The Stockholm birth centre trial: maternal and infant outcome.斯德哥尔摩分娩中心试验:母婴结局
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Apr;104(4):410-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11491.x.
5
Characteristics, interventions, and outcomes of women who used a birthing pool: a prospective observational study.使用分娩池的女性的特征、干预措施和结局:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Birth. 2012 Sep;39(3):192-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2012.00548.x. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
6
Maternity care outcomes: assessing a nursing model of care for low-risk pregnancy.产科护理结果:评估低风险妊娠护理的一种护理模式
Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract. 1998 Apr-Jun;2(2):71-5.
7
Exploring cost and quality: community-based versus traditional hospital delivery systems.探索成本与质量:基于社区的分娩系统与传统医院分娩系统对比
J Health Care Finance. 1996 Fall;23(1):23-47.
8
Economic analysis of two models of low-risk maternity care: a freestanding birth center compared to traditional care.两种低风险孕产妇护理模式的经济分析:独立分娩中心与传统护理的比较。
Res Nurs Health. 2000 Aug;23(4):279-89. doi: 10.1002/1098-240x(200008)23:4<279::aid-nur4>3.0.co;2-f.
9
Differences in optimality index between planned place of birth in a birth centre and alternative planned places of birth, a nationwide prospective cohort study in The Netherlands: results of the Dutch Birth Centre Study.荷兰全国性前瞻性队列研究:出生中心计划分娩地点与其他计划分娩地点的最优性指数差异:荷兰出生中心研究结果
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 16;7(11):e016958. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016958.
10
The economic costs of intrapartum care in Tower Hamlets: A comparison between the cost of birth in a freestanding midwifery unit and hospital for women at low risk of obstetric complications.塔哈姆雷特地区产时护理的经济成本:独立助产单元与医院中低产科并发症风险女性分娩成本的比较。
Midwifery. 2017 Feb;45:28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Midwife continuity of care models versus other models of care for childbearing women.导乐连续性护理模式与其他产妇照护模式的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 10;4(4):CD004667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub6.
2
Vaginal Birth at Term - Part 1. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S3-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/083, December 2020).足月阴道分娩 - 第1部分。德国妇产科学会、奥地利妇产科学会和瑞士妇产科学会指南(S3级,德国医学和科学信息平台注册号015/083,2020年12月)
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2022 Nov 3;82(11):1143-1193. doi: 10.1055/a-1904-6546. eCollection 2022 Nov.
3
Maternal and perinatal outcomes by planned place of birth in Australia 2000 - 2012: a linked population data study.
2000-2012 年澳大利亚按计划分娩地点的母婴围产期结局:一项关联人群数据研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 29;9(10):e029192. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029192.
4
Developing quality indicators for assessing quality of birth centre care: a mixed- methods study.制定评估分娩中心护理质量的质量指标:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Aug 2;17(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1439-9.
5
Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding.促进母乳喂养启动的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 9;11(11):CD001688. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001688.pub3.
6
Evaluation of satisfaction with care in a midwifery unit and an obstetric unit: a randomized controlled trial of low-risk women.助产单元与产科单元护理满意度评估:低风险女性的随机对照试验
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jun 18;16(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0932-x.
7
Alternative versus conventional institutional settings for birth.分娩的替代机构环境与传统机构环境
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD000012. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000012.pub4.
8
Is the operative delivery rate in low-risk women dependent on the level of birth care? A randomised controlled trial.低危产妇的剖宫产率是否取决于分娩照护水平?一项随机对照试验。
BJOG. 2011 Oct;118(11):1357-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03043.x. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
9
Post natal use of analgesics: comparisons between conventional postnatal wards and a maternity hotel.产后镇痛药的使用:传统产后病房与母婴酒店的比较
Pharm World Sci. 2010 Apr;32(2):206-11. doi: 10.1007/s11096-010-9371-3. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
10
Births in two different delivery units in the same clinic--a prospective study of healthy primiparous women.同一诊所两个不同分娩单元的分娩情况——对健康初产妇的前瞻性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 Jun 22;9:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-9-25.