Hancock W W, Sayegh M H, Kwok C A, Weiner H L, Carpenter C B
Department of Pathology and Immunology, Alfred Hospital, Monash Medical School, Prahran, Victoria, Australia.
Transplantation. 1993 May;55(5):1112-8. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199305000-00034.
We studied the mechanisms by which oral or intravenous administration of allogeneic splenocytes prevents sensitization by skin allografts and development of accelerated rejection of subsequent cardiac allografts. LEW rats were sensitized with BN skin allografts 7 days prior to receiving heterotopic (LEW x BN)F1 vascularized cardiac allografts. While unsensitized cardiac allografts are rejected on days 6-8, control sensitized grafts were rejected within 24 to 48 hr. Oral administration of BN splenocytes during the sensitization phase (between skin and heart grafting) has been found to prevent accelerated allograft rejection and prolong cardiac allograft survival to 7 days. An alternative route of antigen exposure, specifically intravenous administration of BN splenocytes (50 x 10(6) daily for 5 days starting on the day of skin grafting), also prevented accelerated cardiac allograft rejection and prolonged allograft survival to 9 +/- 1 days (n = 5). Immunoperoxidase studies of cardiac allografts harvested 24-48 hr posttransplant showed that, when compared with sensitized controls, animals that received oral splenocytes had reduced deposition of IgG (end-point titer of 1/1000 vs. 1/4000), IgM (1/1000 vs. 1/16000), C3 (1/4000 vs. 1/16000), and fibrin (1/4000 vs. 1/16000). There was also decreased infiltration by macrophages (18 +/- 8 vs. 37 +/- 8 cells/HPF, P < 0.01), T cells (5 +/- 3 vs. 19 +/- 7, P < 0.01), and IL-2R+ T cells (5 +/- 3 vs. 15 +/- 4, P < 0.01), and a significant reduction in the numbers and extent of intragraft mononuclear cells stained with antibodies to IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IFN-gamma, and TNF-alpha. In contrast, these grafts showed markedly increased IL-4 staining (including most mononuclear and all endothelial cells), as compared with control grafts (< 20% of mononuclear cells and only focal endothelial staining). Immunoperoxidase studies of cardiac allografts harvested from rats receiving intravenous splenocytes also showed markedly reduced humoral deposits and cellular infiltrates, comparable to that found in the oral splenocytes-treated group, but showed significantly different cytokine expression. In particular, some intragraft mononuclear cell labeling for IFN-gamma remained, and IL-4 staining was not increased relative to control grafts. Attempts were then made to abrogate spleen cell-induced prolongation of cardiac allograft survival by daily injections of CD4 monoclonal antibody (BWH-4 mAb, 700 micrograms) from the time of cardiac transplantation, therapy previously shown unable to prolong cardiac survival in this model when commenced after skin graft-induced sensitization has occurred.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
我们研究了口服或静脉注射同种异体脾细胞预防皮肤同种异体移植致敏以及随后心脏同种异体移植加速排斥反应发生的机制。在接受异位(LEW×BN)F1血管化心脏同种异体移植前7天,用BN皮肤同种异体移植使LEW大鼠致敏。未致敏的心脏同种异体移植在第6 - 8天被排斥,而对照致敏移植在24至48小时内被排斥。发现在致敏阶段(皮肤和心脏移植之间)口服BN脾细胞可预防加速的同种异体移植排斥反应,并使心脏同种异体移植存活期延长至7天。另一种抗原暴露途径,即从皮肤移植当天开始每天静脉注射BN脾细胞(50×10⁶,共5天),也可预防心脏同种异体移植的加速排斥反应,并使同种异体移植存活期延长至9±1天(n = 5)。对移植后24 - 48小时收获的心脏同种异体移植进行免疫过氧化物酶研究表明,与致敏对照相比,接受口服脾细胞的动物IgG(终点滴度为1/1000对1/4000)、IgM(1/1000对1/160,000)、C3(1/4000对1/160,000)和纤维蛋白(1/4000对1/160,000)的沉积减少。巨噬细胞浸润也减少(18±8对37±8个细胞/HPF,P < 0.01),T细胞浸润减少(5±3对19±7,P < 0.01),IL - 2R⁺T细胞浸润减少(5±3对15±4,P < 0.01),并且用抗IL - 1、IL - 2、IL - 6、IL - 8、IFN - γ和TNF - α抗体染色的移植内单核细胞数量和范围显著减少。相比之下,与对照移植相比(<20%的单核细胞且仅为局灶性内皮细胞染色),这些移植显示IL - 4染色明显增加(包括大多数单核细胞和所有内皮细胞)。对接受静脉注射脾细胞的大鼠收获的心脏同种异体移植进行免疫过氧化物酶研究也显示体液沉积物和细胞浸润明显减少,与口服脾细胞治疗组相当,但细胞因子表达有显著差异。特别是,一些移植内单核细胞对IFN - γ的标记仍然存在,并且相对于对照移植,IL - 4染色没有增加。然后尝试从心脏移植时开始每天注射CD4单克隆抗体(BWH - 4 mAb,700微克)来消除脾细胞诱导的心脏同种异体移植存活期延长,先前的研究表明,在皮肤移植诱导的致敏发生后开始这种治疗,在该模型中无法延长心脏存活期。(摘要截断于400字)