Urabe Y, Hamada Y, Spinale F G, Carabello B A, Kent R L, Cooper G, Mann D L
Department of Medicine, Gazes Cardiac Research Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Am J Physiol. 1993 May;264(5 Pt 2):H1615-23. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1993.264.5.H1615.
Previous studies have shown that the right ventricle (RV) appears to tolerate volume overloading better than does the left ventricle (LV). To determine whether this dichotomous response is due to intrinsic differences in the contractile performance of volume hypertrophied RV vs. LV cardiac muscle cells, or cardiocytes, we characterized the contractile performance of cardiocytes isolated from an experimental feline model of biventricular volume overload (n = 7 cats), wherein a peripheral arteriovenous fistula (AVF) produced an identical duration and degree of volume overload for both ventricles; sham-operated cats served as the appropriate controls (n = 7). Cardiocyte contractile function was defined by laser diffraction measurement of sarcomere motion. For the AVF cats, there was a 2.4-fold increase in cardiac output, a significant increase in the RV and LV weight-to-body weight ratios, and a significant increase in cell surface area for the RV and LV cardiocytes. Despite this, cardiocyte contractile function in the AVF cats was entirely normal. Thus there was no significant difference between RV and LV cardiocytes from control cats in the extent or velocity of sarcomere shortening either in 1 cP superfusate or in higher viscosity superfusates, and comparison of RV and LV cells from the AVF cats to those from sham-operated cats again revealed no significant differences. Furthermore, cardiocyte relengthening properties showed no significant differences between AVF and control groups. In summary, this study shows that contractile dysfunction is not an inherent property of either RV or LV cardiac muscle cells hypertrophying in response to substantial volume overloading when preload is increased but afterload is normal.
以往研究表明,右心室(RV)似乎比左心室(LV)更能耐受容量超负荷。为了确定这种二分反应是由于容量性肥厚的右心室与左心室心肌细胞(即心肌细胞)收缩性能的内在差异所致,还是其他原因,我们对从双心室容量超负荷实验猫模型(n = 7只猫)分离出的心肌细胞的收缩性能进行了表征。在该模型中,外周动静脉瘘(AVF)使两个心室的容量超负荷持续时间和程度相同;假手术猫作为适当的对照(n = 7只)。通过激光衍射测量肌节运动来定义心肌细胞的收缩功能。对于AVF猫,心输出量增加了2.4倍,右心室和左心室重量与体重之比显著增加,右心室和左心室心肌细胞的细胞表面积也显著增加。尽管如此,AVF猫的心肌细胞收缩功能完全正常。因此,在1 cP灌注液或更高粘度灌注液中,对照猫的右心室和左心室心肌细胞在肌节缩短程度或速度方面没有显著差异,将AVF猫的右心室和左心室细胞与假手术猫的细胞进行比较,同样没有发现显著差异。此外,心肌细胞的再延长特性在AVF组和对照组之间也没有显著差异。总之,本研究表明,当预负荷增加但后负荷正常时,收缩功能障碍不是右心室或左心室心肌细胞因大量容量超负荷而肥大时的固有特性。