Fairburn C G, Jones R, Peveler R C, Hope R A, O'Connor M
Oxford University, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, United Kingdom.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993 Jun;50(6):419-28. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820180009001.
To determine whether cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for bulimia nervosa has a specific therapeutic effect and determine whether a simplified behavioral treatment (BT) of CBT is as effective as the full treatment.
Randomized controlled trial involving three psychological treatments. Two planned comparisons, CBT with interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT), and CBT with BT. Closed 12-month follow-up period. Independent assessors.
Secondary referral center.
Seventy-five consecutively referred patients with bulimia nervosa. Patients with concurrent anorexia nervosa were excluded.
Cognitive behavior therapy, IPT, BT conducted on an individual outpatient basis. There were nineteen sessions over 18 weeks. Six experienced therapists administered all three treatments. There was no concurrent treatment.
Frequency of binge eating and purging.
High rate (48%) of attrition and withdrawal among the patients who received BT. Over follow-up, few patients undergoing BT met criteria for a good outcome (cessation of all forms of binge eating and purging). Patients in the CBT and IPT treatments made equivalent, substantial, and lasting changes across all areas of symptoms, although there were clear temporal differences in the pattern of response, with IPT taking longer to achieve its effects.
Bulimia nervosa may be treated successfully without focusing directly on the patient's eating habits and attitudes to shape and weight. Cognitive behavior therapy and IPT achieved equivalent effects through the operation of apparently different mediating mechanisms. A further comparison of CBT and IPT is warranted. The behavioral version of CBT was markedly less effective than the full treatment.
确定针对神经性贪食症的认知行为疗法(CBT)是否具有特定治疗效果,并确定CBT的简化行为疗法(BT)是否与完整疗法同样有效。
涉及三种心理治疗的随机对照试验。两项计划比较,即CBT与人际心理治疗(IPT)比较,以及CBT与BT比较。为期12个月的封闭随访期。独立评估者。
二级转诊中心。
连续转诊的75例神经性贪食症患者。排除同时患有神经性厌食症的患者。
在个体门诊基础上进行认知行为疗法、IPT、BT。18周内共19次治疗。6名经验丰富的治疗师实施所有三种治疗。无同时进行的其他治疗。
暴饮暴食和清除行为的频率。
接受BT治疗的患者中,脱落和退出率较高(48%)。在随访期间,接受BT治疗的患者中很少有人达到良好结局标准(停止所有形式的暴饮暴食和清除行为)。CBT和IPT治疗的患者在所有症状领域都有同等程度的显著且持久的改变,尽管在反应模式上存在明显的时间差异,IPT起效较慢。
治疗神经性贪食症不一定需要直接关注患者对体型和体重的饮食习惯及态度。认知行为疗法和IPT通过明显不同的中介机制发挥作用,取得了同等效果。有必要进一步比较CBT和IPT。CBT的行为版本明显不如完整疗法有效。