• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Possible biological mechanisms for a relationship between vasectomy and prostatic cancer.

作者信息

Howards S S

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville 22908.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 1993;29A(7):1060-2. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(05)80224-2.

DOI:10.1016/s0959-8049(05)80224-2
PMID:8499137
Abstract

Four hypotheses have been reviewed, each of which might serve as a hypothetical biological explanation for a relationship between vasectomy and prostate cancer. The endocrine hypothesis is the only one of these with any firm data to support it, although the majority of the available data does not lend credibility to that theory. The other hypotheses are purely speculative with no hard data to support them. In conclusion, it seems highly unlikely, but not impossible, that there is a biological mechanism supporting a relationship between vasectomy and prostate cancer.

摘要

相似文献

1
Possible biological mechanisms for a relationship between vasectomy and prostatic cancer.
Eur J Cancer. 1993;29A(7):1060-2. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(05)80224-2.
2
Prostatic cancer, coital rates, vasectomy and testosterone.前列腺癌、性交频率、输精管切除术与睾酮
J Biosoc Sci. 1994 Apr;26(2):269-72. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000021295.
3
The safety of vasectomy: recent concerns.输精管切除术的安全性:近期关注点
Bull World Health Organ. 1993;71(3-4):413-9.
4
Vasectomy and prostate cancer.输精管切除术与前列腺癌
Adv Contracept. 1993 Jun;9(2):181-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01990149.
5
Vasectomy and prostate cancer: is there a link?输精管切除术与前列腺癌:存在关联吗?
N Z Med J. 1993 Jun 23;106(958):242-3.
6
Vasectomy: potential links to an increased risk of aggressive prostate cancer?输精管切除术:与侵袭性前列腺癌风险增加的潜在关联?
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2015;15(10):1123-5. doi: 10.1586/14737140.2015.1086648. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
7
Vasectomy and prostate cancer risk in China.中国的输精管切除术与前列腺癌风险
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1994 Jun;3(4):285-8.
8
[Vasectomy not associated with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis].[输精管切除术与前列腺癌无关:一项荟萃分析]
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2009 Jun;15(6):545-50.
9
Vasectomy and the risk of prostate cancer in a cohort of multiphasic health-checkup examinees: second report.多阶段健康检查队列中输精管切除术与前列腺癌风险:第二次报告
Cancer Causes Control. 1991 Mar;2(2):113-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00053130.
10
Vasectomy and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.输精管切除术与前列腺癌风险:队列研究的荟萃分析
Sci Rep. 2015 Apr 30;5:9920. doi: 10.1038/srep09920.

引用本文的文献

1
The Association Between Vasectomy and Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.输精管结扎术与前列腺癌之间的关联:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Sep 1;177(9):1273-1286. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.2791.
2
Vasectomy and Prostate Cancer Risk in the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC).欧洲癌症与营养前瞻性调查(EPIC)中的输精管切除术与前列腺癌风险
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr 20;35(12):1297-1303. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.0062. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
3
Vasectomy and Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality in a Large US Cohort.
美国一大群男性队列中的输精管切除术与前列腺癌发病率和死亡率
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Nov 10;34(32):3880-3885. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.66.2361. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
4
Vasectomy and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.输精管切除术与前列腺癌风险:队列研究的荟萃分析
Sci Rep. 2015 Apr 30;5:9920. doi: 10.1038/srep09920.
5
Vasectomy and risk of aggressive prostate cancer: a 24-year follow-up study.输精管切除术与侵袭性前列腺癌风险:一项24年的随访研究
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 20;32(27):3033-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.8446.
6
Is vasectomy harmful to health?输精管切除术对健康有害吗?
Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Jun;47(419):381-6.
7
Alcohol consumption, smoking, and other risk factors and prostate cancer in a large health plan cohort in California (United States).
Cancer Causes Control. 1994 Jan;5(1):66-72. doi: 10.1007/BF01830728.