Reyno L M, Egorin M J, Canetta R M, Jodrell D I, Swenerton K D, Pater J L, Burroughs J N, Novak M J, Sridhara R
Division of Developmental Therapeutics, University of Maryland Cancer Center, Baltimore 21201.
J Clin Oncol. 1993 Jun;11(6):1156-64. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.6.1156.
To determine (1) the impact of cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 on previously defined relationships between carboplatin area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) and indices of toxicity and response in women with advanced ovarian cancer; and (2) the relationships between indices of cumulative drug exposure and clinical outcomes.
Carboplatin AUC = dose/(creatinine clearance [CCr] + 25) and was calculated in 224 women who received carboplatin 300 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2. The likelihood of grade 3 or greater myelotoxicity at any carboplatin AUC was compared with the likelihood of myelotoxicity at the same single-agent carboplatin AUC. The nadir count predicted using the University of Maryland single-agent carboplatin dosing formula was compared with the nadir count observed. Received and relative-received dose-intensity were calculated. Carboplatin exposure-intensity was defined by substituting cumulative carboplatin exposure for total dose. Relationships were sought between these indices and therapeutic outcomes.
The incidence of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia at any carboplatin AUC was greater for the two-drug combination than for single-agent carboplatin. The platelet nadir in 83% of patients was less than or equal to the nadir predicted for the same single-agent carboplatin AUC. Despite a narrow range of received dose-intensities, carboplatin exposure-intensity was distributed over a twofold range. There were no relationships between received and relative-received dose-intensity or carboplatin exposure-intensity and time to progression or survival.
Any carboplatin AUC when administered with cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 produces greater myelotoxicity than the same AUC of single-agent carboplatin. Received carboplatin dose-intensity underestimates the range of plasma drug exposure resulting from a fixed carboplatin dosing regimen. Whether higher carboplatin exposures can improve outcome requires prospective validation.
确定(1)600mg/m²环磷酰胺对先前确定的晚期卵巢癌女性患者血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)与卡铂毒性及反应指标之间关系的影响;(2)累积药物暴露指标与临床结局之间的关系。
卡铂AUC = 剂量/(肌酐清除率[CCr] + 25),在224例接受300mg/m²卡铂和600mg/m²环磷酰胺的女性患者中进行计算。将任何卡铂AUC时3级或更高级别骨髓毒性的可能性与相同单药卡铂AUC时骨髓毒性的可能性进行比较。将使用马里兰大学单药卡铂给药公式预测的最低点计数与观察到的最低点计数进行比较。计算接受剂量强度和相对接受剂量强度。通过用累积卡铂暴露替代总剂量来定义卡铂暴露强度。寻找这些指标与治疗结局之间的关系。
两药联合方案在任何卡铂AUC时白细胞减少和血小板减少的发生率均高于单药卡铂。83%患者的血小板最低点小于或等于相同单药卡铂AUC预测的最低点。尽管接受剂量强度范围较窄,但卡铂暴露强度分布在两倍范围内。接受剂量强度和相对接受剂量强度或卡铂暴露强度与疾病进展时间或生存期之间均无关系。
当与600mg/m²环磷酰胺联合使用时,任何卡铂AUC产生的骨髓毒性均大于相同AUC的单药卡铂。接受的卡铂剂量强度低估了固定卡铂给药方案导致的血浆药物暴露范围。更高的卡铂暴露是否能改善结局需要前瞻性验证。