van Warmerdam L J, Rodenhuis S, van der Wall E, Maes R A, Beijnen J H
Department of Medical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Br J Cancer. 1996 Apr;73(8):979-84. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1996.191.
The aim of this pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study was to define the relationships of the carboplatin exposure with the toxicity in patients treated with high dose carboplatin (400 mg m-2 day-1), cyclophosphamide (1500 mg m-2 day-1) and thiotepa (120 mg m-2 day-1) for four consecutive days, followed by peripheral stem cell transplantation. Exposure to carboplatin was studied in 200 treatment days by measuring the area under the carboplatin plasma ultrafiltrate (pUF) concentration vs time curve (AUC). The AUC was obtained by using a previously validated limited sampling model. A total of 31 patients was studied who received one, two or three courses of this high-dose chemotherapy regimen. The unbound, plasma ultrafiltrate carboplatin was almost completely cleared from the body before each next treatment day in a course; the day-to-day AUC variation was 3.3%. The mean cumulative AUC over 4 days was 19.6 (range 14.1-27.2) mg ml-1 min-1. In 97 treatment days the carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula with the creatinine clearance as the measure for the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). For these courses, the inter-patient variability in pharmacokinetics was significantly reduced from 21% to 15% (P = 0.007) in comparison with the schemes where it was given as a fixed dose of 400 mg m-2. There were no relationships found between toxicity and the AUC of carboplatin, which may be due to the influence of overlapping toxicities of cyclophosphamide and thiotepa. However, the ototoxicity was strongly related to the cumulative carboplatin AUC. This toxicity was dose limiting for carboplatin in this schedule. It appeared that the carboplatin pharmacokinetics in these regimens were similar to those reported at conventional dosages. To reduce the inter-patient variation, the carboplatin dose can be calculated using the Calvert-formula with the creatinine clearance as the measure for the GFR.
本药代动力学/药效学研究的目的是确定接受高剂量卡铂(400mg/m²/天)、环磷酰胺(1500mg/m²/天)和噻替派(120mg/m²/天)连续四天治疗后进行外周干细胞移植的患者中,卡铂暴露量与毒性之间的关系。通过测量卡铂血浆超滤物(pUF)浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC),在200个治疗日中研究卡铂暴露情况。AUC通过使用先前验证的有限采样模型获得。共研究了31例接受一、二或三个疗程这种高剂量化疗方案的患者。在一个疗程的每个下一个治疗日前,未结合的血浆超滤卡铂几乎完全从体内清除;每日AUC变化为3.3%。4天的平均累积AUC为19.6(范围14.1 - 27.2)mg·ml⁻¹·min⁻¹。在97个治疗日中,使用卡尔弗特公式以肌酐清除率作为肾小球滤过率(GFR)的指标来计算卡铂剂量。对于这些疗程,与给予固定剂量400mg/m²的方案相比,患者间药代动力学变异性从21%显著降低至15%(P = 0.007)。未发现毒性与卡铂AUC之间存在关联,这可能是由于环磷酰胺和噻替派重叠毒性的影响。然而,耳毒性与累积卡铂AUC密切相关。这种毒性是该方案中卡铂的剂量限制因素。这些方案中的卡铂药代动力学似乎与常规剂量报道的相似。为减少患者间差异,可使用卡尔弗特公式以肌酐清除率作为GFR的指标来计算卡铂剂量。