• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗保守主义的经济影响。

The economic implications of therapeutic conservatism.

作者信息

Griffin J P, Griffin T D

机构信息

Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry, London.

出版信息

J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1993 Apr;27(2):121-6.

PMID:8501666
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5396627/
Abstract

We review the pattern of prescribing medicines in the United Kingdom (UK) and compare it with that in other European markets. The prescribing of medicines in Britain has always been more conservative than in other major European markets such as France, Italy, Germany, and Spain, but the difference is becoming more marked. The conservative nature of the British prescription medicine market is indicated by three international comparisons. First, British doctors prescribe fewer items per patient per year than their counterparts in other European countries. Second, they are less likely to prescribe a product containing a new active chemical entity (NCE) than their counterparts in other countries. This resistance to the use of newer medicines has increased over the past decade. Third, British doctors rely on a progressively smaller number of active substances for a greater proportion of their prescriptions. As a result of these trends the pharmaceutical industry--at least as far as its British sales are concerned--is becoming more dependent on the sales of older products and on the occasional 'blockbuster' to finance its research. Declining uptake of new medicines, coupled with increasing pressure on doctors to prescribe cheaper generics instead of branded medicines, reduces the ability of pharmaceutical companies to fund their investment in research into as yet unconquered diseases. This trend could work against the interests of both patients and the British economy.

摘要

我们回顾了英国的药品处方模式,并将其与其他欧洲市场的模式进行比较。英国的药品处方一直比法国、意大利、德国和西班牙等其他主要欧洲市场更为保守,而且这种差异正变得愈发明显。英国处方药市场的保守性质体现在三项国际比较中。首先,英国医生每年为每位患者开具的药品数量少于其他欧洲国家的同行。其次,与其他国家的同行相比,他们开具含有新活性化学实体(NCE)产品的可能性较小。在过去十年中,这种对使用新药的抵触情绪有所增加。第三,英国医生在更大比例的处方中依赖的活性物质数量越来越少。由于这些趋势,制药行业——至少就其在英国的销售而言——越来越依赖旧产品的销售以及偶尔出现的“重磅炸弹”药物来为其研究提供资金。新药的采用率下降,再加上医生面临越来越大的压力,要求他们开具更便宜的仿制药而非品牌药,这降低了制药公司为尚未攻克的疾病研究提供资金的能力。这种趋势可能对患者和英国经济的利益都不利。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa43/5396627/52fedf7a069a/jrcollphyslond90360-0026-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa43/5396627/3dd4924bb8d5/jrcollphyslond90360-0022-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa43/5396627/77f0a007648e/jrcollphyslond90360-0022-b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa43/5396627/e577392567c4/jrcollphyslond90360-0023-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa43/5396627/4fa3bf3d3896/jrcollphyslond90360-0023-b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa43/5396627/0c04ffab53fa/jrcollphyslond90360-0024-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa43/5396627/a02516924698/jrcollphyslond90360-0025-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa43/5396627/6e7bd3ac0b95/jrcollphyslond90360-0025-b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa43/5396627/52fedf7a069a/jrcollphyslond90360-0026-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa43/5396627/3dd4924bb8d5/jrcollphyslond90360-0022-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa43/5396627/77f0a007648e/jrcollphyslond90360-0022-b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa43/5396627/e577392567c4/jrcollphyslond90360-0023-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa43/5396627/4fa3bf3d3896/jrcollphyslond90360-0023-b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa43/5396627/0c04ffab53fa/jrcollphyslond90360-0024-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa43/5396627/a02516924698/jrcollphyslond90360-0025-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa43/5396627/6e7bd3ac0b95/jrcollphyslond90360-0025-b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa43/5396627/52fedf7a069a/jrcollphyslond90360-0026-a.jpg

相似文献

1
The economic implications of therapeutic conservatism.治疗保守主义的经济影响。
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1993 Apr;27(2):121-6.
2
Factors affecting the uptake of new medicines in secondary care - a literature review.影响二级医疗中新药采用情况的因素——一项文献综述
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2008 Aug;33(4):339-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2008.00925.x.
3
Cost to the patient or cost to the healthcare system? Which one matters the most for GP prescribing decisions? A UK-Italy comparison.对患者的成本还是对医疗保健系统的成本?对于全科医生的开药决策而言,哪一个最重要?一项英国与意大利的比较。
Eur J Public Health. 2003 Mar;13(1):18-23. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/13.1.18.
4
International variation in prescribing antihypertensive drugs: its extent and possible explanations.抗高血压药物处方的国际差异:程度及可能原因
BMC Health Serv Res. 2005 Mar 11;5(1):21. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-5-21.
5
Global spending on orphan drugs in France, Germany, the UK, Italy and Spain during 2007.2007 年法国、德国、英国、意大利和西班牙的孤儿药全球支出情况。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010;8(5):301-15. doi: 10.2165/11531880-000000000-00000.
6
Generic and therapeutic substitutions in the UK: are they a good thing?英国的非专利药和通用名药替代:这是好事吗?
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Sep;70(3):335-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03718.x.
7
The UK pharmaceutical market. An overview.英国制药市场。概述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1996;10 Suppl 2:14-25. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199600102-00005.
8
Pharmaceutical prescriptions in Italy.意大利的药方。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1995 Summer;11(3):417-27. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300008643.
9
[Early achievements of the Danish pharmaceutical industry--8. Lundbeck].[丹麦制药行业的早期成就——8. 灵北公司]
Theriaca. 2016(43):9-61.
10
The drug market in four European countries.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;14 Suppl 1:69-79. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199814001-00010.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterising polypharmacy in the very old: Findings from the Newcastle 85+ Study.描述非常高龄老年人的多重用药情况:纽卡斯尔 85+ 研究的结果。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 19;16(1):e0245648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245648. eCollection 2021.
2
Barriers for Access to New Medicines: Searching for the Balance Between Rising Costs and Limited Budgets.获取新药的障碍:探寻成本上升与预算有限之间的平衡
Front Public Health. 2018 Dec 5;6:328. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00328. eCollection 2018.
3
Factors affecting the uptake of new medicines: a systematic literature review.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of drug therapy for hypercholesterolaemia: a review of the literature.高胆固醇血症药物治疗的成本效益:文献综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 1992 Jul;2(1):34-42. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199202010-00005.
2
Conflict over drug policy in Australia.澳大利亚毒品政策之争。
BMJ. 1989 Feb 25;298(6672):472-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6672.472.
影响新药采用的因素:一项系统文献综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 20;14:469. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-469.
4
Variation over time in the association between polypharmacy and mortality in the older population.老年人中多种药物治疗与死亡率之间的关联随时间的变化。
Drugs Aging. 2011 Jul 1;28(7):547-60. doi: 10.2165/11592000-000000000-00000.
5
Prescribing new drugs: qualitative study of influences on consultants and general practitioners.新药处方:对顾问医生和全科医生影响因素的定性研究
BMJ. 2001 Aug 18;323(7309):378-81. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7309.378.
6
[Analysis of drug consumption with indicators of prescription quality].[使用处方质量指标对药物消费进行分析]
Aten Primaria. 2000 May 31;25(9):618-24. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(00)78582-9.
7
Therapeutic substitution and therapeutic conservatism as cost-containment strategies in primary care: a study of fundholders and non-fundholders.作为基层医疗中成本控制策略的治疗性替代与治疗保守主义:一项针对基金持有者与非基金持有者的研究
Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Jun;49(443):431-5.
8
The need for pharmacoeconomic evaluations in the NHS.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中药物经济学评估的必要性。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Sep;14(3):241-50. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199814030-00001.
9
Constraints on antidepressant prescribing and principles of cost-effective antidepressant use. Part 1: Depression and its treatment.抗抑郁药物处方的限制及具有成本效益的抗抑郁药物使用原则。第1部分:抑郁症及其治疗。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 May;11(5):419-43. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199711050-00005.
10
An historical survey of UK government measures to control the NHS medicines expenditure from 1948 to 1996.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1996 Sep;10(3):210-24. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199610030-00003.