Kim Y G
Department of Economics, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242.
J Theor Biol. 1993 Mar 7;161(1):13-21. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1993.1036.
It is shown that there are at least two evolutionarily stable strategies, or ESSs, in the war of attrition with a role asymmetry when players make an error with a small but positive probability in implementing their strategy choices. This result proves Maynard Smith's original conjecture that players should choose asymmetric pure strategies in the asymmetric war of attrition. It is also in contrast to the standard non-existence result of an ESS in this game under complete information. To derive this result we discretize the original game and apply the limit ESS condition introduced by Selten. The result is also compared with other evolutionary analyses of this game.
研究表明,在具有角色不对称性的消耗战中,当参与者在实施其策略选择时以小但为正的概率犯错时,至少存在两种进化稳定策略(ESS)。这一结果证明了梅纳德·史密斯最初的猜想,即在不对称消耗战中参与者应选择不对称纯策略。这也与该博弈在完全信息下ESS的标准不存在结果形成对比。为了得出这一结果,我们对原始博弈进行离散化,并应用塞尔滕引入的极限ESS条件。该结果还与该博弈的其他进化分析进行了比较。