Hook B G, Callans D J, Kleiman R B, Flores B T, Marchlinski F E
Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104.
Circulation. 1993 Jun;87(6):1897-906. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.87.6.1897.
This report describes the value of stored ventricular electrogram analysis in the diagnosis and management of patients experiencing minimal or no symptoms before implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy.
The study population included 48 patients who received the Cadence Tiered Therapy Defibrillator System, an investigational third-generation ICD with ventricular electrogram storage capabilities. Criteria for arrhythmia diagnosis were based on analysis of the electrogram rate, RR interval variability, and morphology. Twenty-nine of the 48 patients (60%) experienced at least one episode of antitachycardia pacing or shock (one shock or more in 25 of 29 patients) that was preceded by minimal or no symptoms during a mean follow-up of 15.1 +/- 7.8 months. There were 194 tachycardia episodes registered by the device, including 101 for which ventricular electrograms were stored and available for analysis. Of the 101 stored electrograms, 74 were classified as ventricular tachycardia (VT), 24 as non-VT rhythms (atrial fibrillation, 13; supraventricular tachycardia, six; rate-sensing lead disruption, four; T wave oversensing, one), and only three as indeterminate rhythms. Based on the electrogram analysis, changes in tachycardia detection criteria and/or antiarrhythmic drug regimens were implemented and were associated with a reduction in the number of device responses for non-VT rhythms from 24 during the initial study period to three during 11.0 +/- 7.2 months of additional follow-up.
ICD responses in the absence of symptoms are relatively common in third-generation devices with antitachycardia pacing capabilities. Despite potential limitations such as the effect of bundle branch block on the electrogram morphology during supraventricular tachycardia, the availability of electrogram storage capabilities allowed a presumptive diagnosis of the events precipitating asymptomatic device responses. Device reprogramming based on analysis of stored electrograms was associated with a dramatic reduction in the incidence of ICD responses for non-VT rhythms.
本报告描述了存储的心室电图分析在植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)治疗前症状轻微或无症状患者的诊断和管理中的价值。
研究人群包括48例接受Cadence分层治疗除颤器系统的患者,这是一种具有心室电图存储功能的第三代研究性ICD。心律失常的诊断标准基于对电图速率、RR间期变异性和形态的分析。在平均15.1±7.8个月的随访期间,48例患者中有29例(60%)经历了至少一次抗心动过速起搏或电击(29例患者中有25例经历了一次或多次电击),且在此之前症状轻微或无症状。该设备记录了194次心动过速发作,其中101次存储了心室电图并可供分析。在101份存储的电图中,74份被分类为室性心动过速(VT),24份为非VT节律(心房颤动,13份;室上性心动过速,6份;速率感知导联中断,4份;T波过度感知,1份),只有3份为不确定节律。基于电图分析,实施了心动过速检测标准和/或抗心律失常药物方案的改变,这与非VT节律的设备反应次数从初始研究期间的24次减少到额外随访11.0±7.2个月期间的3次相关。
在具有抗心动过速起搏功能的第三代设备中,无症状时的ICD反应相对常见。尽管存在潜在限制,如束支传导阻滞对室上性心动过速期间电图形态的影响,但电图存储功能的可用性使得能够对导致无症状设备反应的事件进行推定诊断。基于存储电图分析的设备重新编程与非VT节律的ICD反应发生率显著降低相关。