Suppr超能文献

决定男性避孕方法使用普及率的因素。

Factors that determine prevalence of use of contraceptive methods for men.

作者信息

Ringheim K

机构信息

Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Stud Fam Plann. 1993 Mar-Apr;24(2):87-99.

PMID:8511809
Abstract

Globally, men have not shared equally with women the responsibility for fertility regulation. While family planning efforts have been directed almost exclusively toward women, the lack of male involvement may also reflect the limited options available to men. Current methods for men are either coitus-dependent, such as the condom or withdrawal, or permanent, such as vasectomy. The 20-year history of social science research on male contraceptive methods is examined here in terms of the human and method factors related to the acceptability of hypothetical methods and the prevalence of use of existing methods. New male methods, particularly if reversible, may alter men's willingness to accept or share responsibility for the control of fertility. Research opportunities in the areas of gender, decision-making, communication, health education, and service delivery will be enhanced when methods for women and men are comparable.

摘要

在全球范围内,男性在生育调节责任方面与女性分担不均。虽然计划生育工作几乎完全针对女性,但男性参与度不足也可能反映出男性可选择的方法有限。目前男性使用的方法要么依赖性交,如避孕套或体外射精,要么是永久性的,如输精管切除术。本文从与假设方法的可接受性以及现有方法的使用普及率相关的人为因素和方法因素方面,审视了社会科学对男性避孕方法长达20年的研究历史。新的男性避孕方法,尤其是如果具有可逆性,可能会改变男性接受或分担生育控制责任的意愿。当男女避孕方法具有可比性时,在性别、决策、沟通、健康教育和服务提供等领域的研究机会将会增加。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验