Suppr超能文献

低浓度氟烷和异氟烷作为支气管扩张剂的比较。

Comparison of low concentrations of halothane and isoflurane as bronchodilators.

作者信息

Brown R H, Zerhouni E A, Hirshman C A

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 1993 Jun;78(6):1097-101. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199306000-00012.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although high concentrations of all currently used inhalational anesthetics are thought to be good bronchodilators, studies using traditional measures of airway tone fail to show differences in airway responsiveness during halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane use. Using a more sensitive technique, the authors compared the ability of halothane and isoflurane to dilate histamine-constricted airways at equivalent MAC concentrations.

METHODS

Responses of histamine-constricted individual airways to increasing doses of halothane and isoflurane were directly measured using high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Fifteen studies were performed in five dogs. All dogs were initially anesthetized with thiopental 15 mg/kg followed by a 10-mg.kg-1 x h-1 maintenance dose. Following tracheal intubation, the lungs were mechanically ventilated (15 ml/kg, 15 bpm). The airways were constricted with intravenous histamine 200 micrograms/min. On alternate days, the dogs subsequently received increasing concentrations of either halothane or isoflurane (0.6, 1.1, and 1.7 MAC). On a separate day, the dogs received atropine 0.2 mg/kg after the histamine infusion and the study was repeated.

RESULTS

Histamine decreased airway area 34 +/- 2.5% (mean +/- SEM). All preconstricted airways showed a significant dose-dependent dilation to halothane and isoflurane at concentrations of 0.6, 1.1, and 1.7 MAC. Halothane significantly dilated airways to a greater extent than isoflurane at 0.6 and 1.1 MAC (P < 0.001). This effect was most pronounced in airways less than 3 mm in diameter. At 1.7 MAC, there was no significant difference between the two agents (P = 0.42). Atropine (0.2 mg/kg) reversed the airway constriction elicited by intravenous histamine. The histamine-preconstricted airways area increased 370 +/- 34% (P < 0.0001) after atropine.

CONCLUSIONS

Halothane and isoflurane dilate histamine-constricted airways in a dose-dependent manner. However, at low concentrations, halothane was a more effective bronchodilator than isoflurane at equivalent MAC doses.

摘要

背景

尽管目前所有使用的吸入麻醉剂的高浓度被认为是良好的支气管扩张剂,但使用传统气道张力测量方法的研究未能显示在使用氟烷、恩氟烷和异氟烷期间气道反应性的差异。作者使用一种更敏感的技术,比较了氟烷和异氟烷在等效MAC浓度下扩张组胺收缩气道的能力。

方法

使用高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)直接测量组胺收缩的单个气道对递增剂量氟烷和异氟烷的反应。在5只狗身上进行了15项研究。所有狗最初用硫喷妥钠15mg/kg麻醉,随后给予10mg·kg-1·h-1的维持剂量。气管插管后,肺进行机械通气(15ml/kg,15次/分钟)。气道用静脉注射组胺200μg/分钟收缩。在交替的日子里,狗随后接受递增浓度的氟烷或异氟烷(0.6、1.1和1.7MAC)。在单独的一天,狗在组胺输注后接受阿托品0.2mg/kg,然后重复该研究。

结果

组胺使气道面积减少34±2.5%(平均值±标准误)。所有预先收缩的气道在0.6、1.1和1.7MAC浓度下对氟烷和异氟烷均表现出显著的剂量依赖性扩张。在0.6和1.1MAC时,氟烷使气道扩张的程度明显大于异氟烷(P<0.001)。这种效应在直径小于3mm的气道中最为明显。在1.7MAC时,两种药物之间无显著差异(P=0.42)。阿托品(0.2mg/kg)逆转了静脉注射组胺引起的气道收缩。组胺预先收缩的气道面积在阿托品后增加了370±34%(P<0.0001)。

结论

氟烷和异氟烷以剂量依赖性方式扩张组胺收缩的气道。然而,在低浓度时,在等效MAC剂量下氟烷是比异氟烷更有效的支气管扩张剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验