Suppr超能文献

不同热手术方式下卵巢楔形切除术后的损伤与粘连形成

Injury and adhesion formation following ovarian wedge resection with different thermal surgical modalities.

作者信息

Bhatta N, Isaacson K, Flotte T, Schiff I, Anderson R R

机构信息

Department of Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.

出版信息

Lasers Surg Med. 1993;13(3):344-52. doi: 10.1002/lsm.1900130311.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the role of bleeding, acute thermal damage, and charring in adhesion formation. Postoperative adhesions were compared following ovarian wedge resection in 48 rabbits using different lasers, electrosurgery, and scalpel. Twelve ovaries were sectioned per modality, in randomized pairs. Acute thermal injury as assessed by histology, bleeding, and charring differed among the modalities used. Adhesions were assessed 4 weeks later, by an investigator completely blinded of the treatment protocol. The adhesion scores were 11.6 +/- 8.0 with pulsed Er:YAG laser; 11.9 +/- 7.5 with scalpel; 8.3 +/- 9.3 with electrocautery; 6.7 +/- 8.8 with a continuous (c.w.) Nd:YAG laser; 5.3 +/- 4.8 with c.w. CO2 laser; 3.1 +/- 2.7 with pulsed CO2 laser; 1.7 +/- 1.8 with pulsed Ho:YAG laser; and 0.8 +/- 1.5 in the control (no resection) group. Ho:YAG, Nd:YAG, and electrocautery were completely hemostatic. Bleeding was minimal with the CO2 lasers. Er:YAG and scalpel caused maximum bleeding, requiring hemostatic measures to prevent exsanguination. Charring occurred with electrocautery, CO2 laser, and Nd:YAG laser. Bleeding and charring correlated with adhesion formation, but the histological depth of thermal damage did not. The Ho:YAG laser is a hemostatic, fiber-optic compatible laser causing significantly fewer adhesions (P < 0.04) than scalpel, electrocautery, Nd:YAG, Er:YAG, and c.w. CO2 lasers. Clinical use of the Ho:YAG laser, and the role of carbonization in promoting adhesions, deserve further study.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定出血、急性热损伤和碳化在粘连形成中的作用。在48只兔子的卵巢楔形切除术后,使用不同的激光、电外科手术和手术刀比较术后粘连情况。每种方式随机选取12对卵巢进行手术。所使用的不同方式在组织学评估的急性热损伤、出血和碳化方面存在差异。4周后,由对治疗方案完全不知情的研究人员评估粘连情况。脉冲式铒:钇铝石榴石激光治疗后的粘连评分为11.6±8.0;手术刀治疗为11.9±7.5;电灼治疗为8.3±9.3;连续波钕:钇铝石榴石激光治疗为6.7±8.8;连续波二氧化碳激光治疗为5.3±4.8;脉冲式二氧化碳激光治疗为3.1±2.7;脉冲式钬:钇铝石榴石激光治疗为1.7±1.8;对照组(未切除)为0.8±1.5。钬:钇铝石榴石激光、钕:钇铝石榴石激光和电灼治疗完全止血。二氧化碳激光治疗出血极少。铒:钇铝石榴石激光和手术刀导致出血最多,需要采取止血措施以防止失血过多。电灼治疗、二氧化碳激光和钕:钇铝石榴石激光会出现碳化。出血和碳化与粘连形成相关,但热损伤的组织学深度与粘连形成无关。钬:钇铝石榴石激光是一种止血的、与光纤兼容的激光,与手术刀、电灼治疗、钕:钇铝石榴石激光、铒:钇铝石榴石激光和连续波二氧化碳激光相比,其导致的粘连明显更少(P<0.04)。钬:钇铝石榴石激光的临床应用以及碳化在促进粘连中的作用值得进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验