Suppr超能文献

医生对绝经前后激素治疗的看法。

Physicians' views on hormone therapy around and after menopause.

作者信息

Hemminki E, Topo P, Malin M, Kangas I

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Maturitas. 1993 May;16(3):163-73. doi: 10.1016/0378-5122(93)90062-m.

Abstract

Estrogens and progestins are commonly and increasingly used during and after menopause. We studied Finnish physicians' views of this hormone therapy based on their specialty. A questionnaire was sent to a stratified random sample of gynecologists, internists, general practitioners and nonspecialists (n = 500; response rate 74%). Reported prescription habits and opinions concerning benefits and harms of hormones were asked and compared to current literature. Combined therapy was much more popular than was estrogen alone. One fourth of the physicians said hormones should be preventively given to all or to all those at risk for osteoporosis. Long therapies were accepted by many and for our patient cases hormones were recommended much more commonly than were other medical therapies. Most considered prevention of osteoporosis to be a benefit of combined therapy, but opinions of other benefits and harms varied. Gynecologists had the most favourable opinions and most of them considered hormone therapy very useful; the other physicians' opinions were characterized by uncertainties about hormone therapy and its long term effects.

摘要

雌激素和孕激素在绝经期间及绝经后被广泛且越来越多地使用。我们基于芬兰医生的专业领域研究了他们对这种激素疗法的看法。向妇科医生、内科医生、全科医生和非专科医生的分层随机样本(n = 500;回复率74%)发放了问卷。询问了他们报告的处方习惯以及关于激素益处和危害的看法,并与当前文献进行比较。联合疗法比单独使用雌激素更受欢迎。四分之一的医生表示,激素应该预防性地给予所有或所有有骨质疏松风险的人。许多人接受长期治疗,对于我们的患者病例,推荐使用激素的频率比其他医学疗法高得多。大多数人认为预防骨质疏松是联合疗法的一个益处,但对于其他益处和危害的看法各不相同。妇科医生的看法最为积极,他们中的大多数人认为激素疗法非常有用;其他医生的看法则表现为对激素疗法及其长期影响存在不确定性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验