Cragle S P, Brandenburg J H
Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison 53792.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993 Jun;108(6):648-54. doi: 10.1177/019459989310800605.
Health care costs have risen dramatically in recent years. Cost-containment strategies have become necessary to ensure that adequate medical care is accessible to all who need it. These strategies include choosing the least costly of several treatment modalities with equal efficacy. Radiotherapy has been considered by some as the treatment of choice for early glottic tumors. Rationale for this is based on two major assumptions: that cure rates are equal for radiotherapy and surgery, and that voice preservation and quality is superior with radiotherapy. Implicit in these assumptions is the idea that cost of therapy should not be a factor in selecting an alternative. This study presents a literature review of cure rates for laser cordectomy and radiotherapy for T1 glottic cancers. An objective voice analysis was performed on 14 patients with T1 glottic cancers treated with laser cordectomy and the results were compared to a group of 20 patients treated with radiotherapy for similar early tumors. Finally, the average total cost of each modality was calculated and compared. Our findings indicate that: (1) cure rates are equivalent; (2) voice quality after laser cordectomy is as good as that noted after radiotherapy; and (3) total cost of therapy is much less for laser cordectomy than for radiotherapy. We advocate laser cordectomy rather than radiotherapy for most early glottic tumors.
近年来,医疗保健费用急剧上涨。成本控制策略已成为必要手段,以确保所有有需要的人都能获得足够的医疗服务。这些策略包括在几种疗效相同的治疗方式中选择成本最低的。一些人认为放射治疗是早期声门肿瘤的首选治疗方法。其依据基于两个主要假设:放射治疗和手术的治愈率相同,以及放射治疗在保留嗓音和嗓音质量方面更具优势。这些假设中隐含的观点是,治疗成本不应成为选择治疗方法的一个因素。本研究对T1期声门癌的激光声带切除术和放射治疗的治愈率进行了文献综述。对14例接受激光声带切除术治疗的T1期声门癌患者进行了客观的嗓音分析,并将结果与一组20例接受类似早期肿瘤放射治疗的患者进行了比较。最后,计算并比较了每种治疗方式的平均总成本。我们的研究结果表明:(1)治愈率相当;(2)激光声带切除术后的嗓音质量与放射治疗后的嗓音质量一样好;(3)激光声带切除术的治疗总成本远低于放射治疗。对于大多数早期声门肿瘤,我们主张采用激光声带切除术而非放射治疗。