Suppr超能文献

双工超声中的信号处理器:模拟与数字方法的体外比较。

Signal processors in duplex sonography: in vitro comparison between analog and digital methods.

作者信息

Zoller W G, Wierscher C, Wagner D R

机构信息

Medizinische Poliklinik, Universität München, Germany.

出版信息

Res Exp Med (Berl). 1993;193(2):105-15. doi: 10.1007/BF02576217.

Abstract

Using a new flow-test phantom, which respects the acoustic properties of real blood as well as the proximal and distal impedances of body circulation, we assessed the performance of two duplex sonography signal processors on blood-flow measurements. With both the analog and the dynamic signal processor (Fast Fourier Transform), the correlation between duplex sonography and quantitative flow measurements was high (0.96-0.99) for different dynamic conditions (steady or pulsatile blood flow, varying heart rate, blood pressure, and hematocrit) and for different mechanical conditions (silicon tube or animal vessel). The real blood flow was overestimated by duplex sonography; the over-estimation was more pronounced with the analog processor (factor 1.87-4.20) than with the digital processor (factor 1.22-1.64, P < 0.05). Applied to the study of asymmetric stenoses, the digital processor was not superior to the analog processors described in the literature.

摘要

我们使用一种新型血流测试体模,该体模既考虑了真实血液的声学特性,也考虑了体循环的近端和远端阻抗,评估了两种双功超声信号处理器在血流测量方面的性能。对于不同的动态条件(稳定或搏动性血流、不同的心率、血压和血细胞比容)以及不同的机械条件(硅胶管或动物血管),无论是模拟信号处理器还是动态信号处理器(快速傅里叶变换),双功超声与定量血流测量之间的相关性都很高(0.96 - 0.99)。双功超声高估了实际血流;模拟处理器的高估更为明显(系数为1.87 - 4.20),高于数字处理器(系数为1.22 - 1.64,P < 0.05)。应用于不对称狭窄的研究时,数字处理器并不优于文献中描述的模拟处理器。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验