Pratt H, Geva A B, Mittelman N
Evoked Potentials Laboratory, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Acta Otolaryngol. 1993 May;113(3):279-84. doi: 10.3109/00016489309135809.
The widely used quantitative descriptors of amplitude and latency of evoked potentials, for peaks and troughs along the waveform, relate to only a limited number of points along the waveform, ignoring the interposed data. Moreover, these descriptors are typically determined manually, rendering them susceptible to user bias. We propose and demonstrate a machine-scoring algorithm for the identification and measurement of Auditory Brainstem Evoked Potentials (ABEP) peaks I, III and V. We further introduce an algorithm for the quantitative analysis of ABEP by waveform, and for clustering records according to waveform characteristics. The results of computerized peak identification and measurement, without user intervention, were correlated with manual measurements of the same peaks in a large number of waveforms. The waveform analysis and classification procedure differentiated waveforms to monaural left, monaural right and binaural stimulation, as well as according to the recording montage. These results underscore the advantages of using information in the waveform of ABEP, which has so far been overlooked. The automated algorithms for evaluation of ABEP by waveform hold the promise of a more comprehensive and consistent evaluation, and hence improved sensitivity.
广泛使用的诱发电位幅度和潜伏期的定量描述符,用于波形上的峰值和谷值,仅涉及波形上有限数量的点,而忽略了其间的数据。此外,这些描述符通常是手动确定的,容易受到用户偏差的影响。我们提出并演示了一种用于识别和测量听觉脑干诱发电位(ABEP)I、III和V波峰的机器评分算法。我们还引入了一种通过波形对ABEP进行定量分析以及根据波形特征对记录进行聚类的算法。在无需用户干预的情况下,计算机化的波峰识别和测量结果与大量波形中相同波峰的手动测量结果相关。波形分析和分类程序能够区分单耳左、单耳右和双耳刺激的波形,以及根据记录蒙太奇进行区分。这些结果强调了利用ABEP波形中迄今被忽视的信息的优势。通过波形评估ABEP的自动化算法有望实现更全面和一致的评估,从而提高灵敏度。