• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

咪达唑仑和芬太尼持续输注麻醉用于心脏手术:计算机辅助输注系统与手动输注系统的比较

Midazolam and fentanyl continuous infusion anesthesia for cardiac surgery: a comparison of computer-assisted versus manual infusion systems.

作者信息

Theil D R, Stanley T E, White W D, Goodman D K, Glass P S, Bai S A, Jacobs J R, Reves J G

机构信息

Heart Center of Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1993 Jun;7(3):300-6. doi: 10.1016/1053-0770(93)90009-a.

DOI:10.1016/1053-0770(93)90009-a
PMID:8518376
Abstract

Continuous infusion of intravenous anesthetics can be achieved either by a manually controlled infusion (MCI) pump, or by a computer-assisted continuous infusion (CACI) pharmacokinetic model-driven infusion system. Randomized double-blind comparisons of the two infusion systems for general anesthesia were performed in 24 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Patients were allocated to receive continuous infusions of midazolam and fentanyl by either a MCI device or CACI. Midazolam and fentanyl infusions were independently titrated to maintain hemodynamic stability, defined as mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) within 20% of baseline values. As directed by the study design, comparable hemodynamic control was achieved in both groups. Mean plasma fentanyl concentrations measured at specific timepoints were similar between groups. The plasma midazolam level for induction was 196 +/- 139 ng/mL in the CACI group and 300 +/- 128 ng/mL in the MCI group, and the fentanyl level was similar in both groups, 6.7 +/- 1.9 ng/mL in CACI and 6.3 +/- 4.6 ng/mL in the MCI group. The drug levels were lower (P < or = .05) for midazolam during maintenance of anesthesia and similar for fentanyl during the maintenance of anesthesia. In the MCI group, the average duration of anesthesia was 246.5 +/- 35.0 minutes, with a mean total fentanyl dose of 30.27 +/- 11.14 micrograms/kg. In the CACI group, the average duration of anesthesia was 230.8 +/- 44.1 minutes, with a mean total fentanyl dose of 34.61 +/- 5.40 micrograms/kg (P > 0.05 for comparisons between groups for duration of anesthesia and total fentanyl dose).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

静脉麻醉药的持续输注可通过手动控制输注(MCI)泵或计算机辅助持续输注(CACI)药代动力学模型驱动的输注系统来实现。对24例接受冠状动脉搭桥手术的患者进行了这两种输注系统用于全身麻醉的随机双盲比较。患者被分配通过MCI设备或CACI接受咪达唑仑和芬太尼的持续输注。咪达唑仑和芬太尼输注分别进行滴定以维持血流动力学稳定,定义为平均动脉压(MAP)和心率(HR)在基线值的20%以内。根据研究设计,两组均实现了可比的血流动力学控制。两组在特定时间点测得的平均血浆芬太尼浓度相似。CACI组诱导时血浆咪达唑仑水平为196±139 ng/mL,MCI组为300±128 ng/mL,两组芬太尼水平相似,CACI组为6.7±1.9 ng/mL,MCI组为6.3±4.6 ng/mL。麻醉维持期间咪达唑仑的药物水平较低(P≤0.05),芬太尼在麻醉维持期间相似。在MCI组,平均麻醉持续时间为246.5±35.0分钟,平均芬太尼总剂量为30.27±11.14微克/千克。在CACI组,平均麻醉持续时间为230.8±44.1分钟,平均芬太尼总剂量为34.61±5.40微克/千克(麻醉持续时间和芬太尼总剂量的组间比较P>0.05)。(摘要截断于250字)

相似文献

1
Midazolam and fentanyl continuous infusion anesthesia for cardiac surgery: a comparison of computer-assisted versus manual infusion systems.咪达唑仑和芬太尼持续输注麻醉用于心脏手术:计算机辅助输注系统与手动输注系统的比较
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1993 Jun;7(3):300-6. doi: 10.1016/1053-0770(93)90009-a.
2
Computer-assisted continuous infusions of fentanyl during cardiac anesthesia: comparison with a manual method.心脏麻醉期间计算机辅助持续输注芬太尼:与手动方法的比较。
Anesthesiology. 1985 Jul;63(1):41-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198507000-00006.
3
Alfentanil and midazolam: new anesthetic drugs for continuous infusion and an automated method of administration.阿芬太尼和咪达唑仑:用于持续输注的新型麻醉药物及自动给药方法。
Mt Sinai J Med. 1989 Mar;56(2):99-107.
4
Pharmacokinetic model-driven infusion of fentanyl: assessment of accuracy.药代动力学模型驱动的芬太尼输注:准确性评估
Anesthesiology. 1990 Dec;73(6):1082-90. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199012000-00004.
5
Performance of computer-assisted continuous infusion at low concentrations of intravenous sedatives.低浓度静脉镇静剂的计算机辅助持续输注性能
Anesth Analg. 1997 May;84(5):1049-57. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199705000-00018.
6
Computerized continuous infusion of intravenous anesthetic drugs during pediatric cardiac surgery.小儿心脏手术期间静脉麻醉药物的计算机化持续输注。
Anesth Analg. 1991 Apr;72(4):487-92. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199104000-00012.
7
A randomized trial of anesthetic induction agents in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction.一项针对冠心病合并左心室功能不全患者麻醉诱导药物的随机试验。
Ann Card Anaesth. 2010 Sep-Dec;13(3):217-23. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.69057.
8
Hemodynamic effects of a lorazepam-fentanyl anesthetic induction for coronary artery bypass surgery.用于冠状动脉旁路移植手术的劳拉西泮 - 芬太尼麻醉诱导的血流动力学效应
J Cardiothorac Anesth. 1990 Jun;4(3):314-7. doi: 10.1016/0888-6296(90)90037-g.
9
Comparison of isoflurane and midazolam as hypnotic supplementation to moderately high-dose fentanyl during coronary artery bypass grafting: effects on systemic hemodynamics and early postoperative recovery profile.冠状动脉搭桥手术期间异氟烷和咪达唑仑作为中度高剂量芬太尼催眠补充剂的比较:对全身血流动力学和术后早期恢复情况的影响
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1997 Oct;11(6):740-5. doi: 10.1016/s1053-0770(97)90168-3.
10
Optimizing sedation following major vascular surgery: a double-blind study of midazolam administered by continuous infusion.大型血管手术后镇静的优化:咪达唑仑持续输注的双盲研究
Can J Anaesth. 1994 Sep;41(9):782-93. doi: 10.1007/BF03011584.

引用本文的文献

1
Computerized advice on drug dosage to improve prescribing practice.关于药物剂量的计算机化建议,以改善处方实践。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 12;2013(11):CD002894. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002894.pub3.
2
Combining sevoflurane anesthesia with fentanyl-midazolam or s-ketamine in laboratory mice.在实验小鼠中将七氟醚麻醉与芬太尼-咪达唑仑或S-氯胺酮联合使用。
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2012 Mar;51(2):209-18.
3
Computer support for determining drug dose: systematic review and meta-analysis.计算机辅助确定药物剂量:系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMJ. 1999 Apr 10;318(7189):984-90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7189.984.