Miller D R, Martineau R J, Hull K A, Vallée F, LeBel M
Department of Anaesthesia, Ottawa General Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ontario.
Can J Anaesth. 1994 Sep;41(9):782-93. doi: 10.1007/BF03011584.
A randomized, double-blind study was undertaken to determine the dose requirements, recovery characteristics, and pharmacokinetic variables of midazolam given by continuous infusion for sedation in patients following abdominal aortic surgery. Thirty subjects, 50-75 yr, scheduled to undergo aortic reconstructive surgery, entered the study. Following a nitrous oxide-isoflurane-opioid anaesthetic technique, patients were randomly allocated to receive one of three loading doses (0.03, 0.06 or 0.1 mg.kg-1) and initial infusion rates (0.5, 1.0 or 1.5 micrograms.kg-1.min-1) of midazolam, corresponding to groups low (L), moderate (M) and high (H). The infusion of midazolam was adjusted to maintain sedation levels of "3, 4 or 5," which permitted eye opening in response to either verbal command or a light shoulder tap, using a seven-point scale ranging from "0" (awake, agitated) to "6" (asleep, non-responsive). Additionally morphine was given in increments of 2.0 mg iv prn for analgesia. On the morning after surgery, midazolam was discontinued, and the tracheas were extubated when patients were awake. Blood samples were taken during, and at increasing intervals for 48 hr following discontinuation of the infusion, and analyzed by gas chromatography. The desired level of sedation was maintained during more than 94% of the infusion period in all three groups, with a maximum of three dose adjustments per patient, for treatment which lasted 16.3 +/- 0.6 hr. There was, however, an increase in both the infusion rates and mean plasma concentrations from Group L to Group H (P < 0.05), which corresponded to an inverse relationship of morphine requirements during the period of sedation (P < 0.05, Group H vs Group L). Optimal midazolam infusion rates and resulting plasma concentrations at the times the infusions were discontinued (in parentheses) were as follows-Group L: 0.60 +/- 0.18 microgram.kg-1.min-1 (76 +/- 32 ng.mL-1), Group M: 0.90 +/- 0.52 microgram.kg-1.min-1 (133 +/- 71 ng.mL-1), and Group H: 1.34 +/- 0.69 microgram.kg-1.min-1 (206 +/- 106 ng.mL-1). Times to awakening were longer in Group H: 3.1 +/- 3.4 hr, than in Group L: 1.1 +/- 0.8 h, P < 0.05. Pharmacokinetic variables were found to be dose-independent over the range of infusion rates. Mean values were t1/2 beta = 4.4 +/- 1.5 hr, CL = 5.94 +/- 1.69 mL.min-1.kg-1, Vd = 3.13 +/- 1.07 L.kg-1.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
进行了一项随机双盲研究,以确定在腹主动脉手术后患者中持续输注咪达唑仑用于镇静的剂量需求、恢复特征和药代动力学变量。30名年龄在50至75岁、计划接受主动脉重建手术的受试者进入该研究。采用氧化亚氮-异氟烷-阿片类麻醉技术后,患者被随机分配接受三种负荷剂量(0.03、0.06或0.1mg·kg⁻¹)和初始输注速率(0.5、1.0或1.5μg·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹)之一的咪达唑仑,分别对应低(L)、中(M)、高(H)组。咪达唑仑的输注进行调整,以维持“3、4或5”的镇静水平,该水平允许在口头指令或轻轻轻拍肩部时睁眼,使用从“0”(清醒、烦躁)到“6”(睡着、无反应)的七点量表。此外,必要时静脉注射吗啡,每次增量2.0mg用于镇痛。术后早晨,停用咪达唑仑,患者清醒后拔除气管插管。在输注期间以及输注停止后48小时内每隔一段时间采集血样,并通过气相色谱法进行分析。在所有三组中,超过94%的输注期间维持了所需的镇静水平,每位患者最多进行三次剂量调整,治疗持续16.3±0.6小时。然而,从L组到H组,输注速率和平均血浆浓度均升高(P<0.05),这与镇静期间吗啡需求量呈反比关系(P<0.05,H组与L组相比)。输注停止时(括号内)的最佳咪达唑仑输注速率和由此产生的血浆浓度如下:L组:0.60±0.18μg·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹(76±32ng·mL⁻¹),M组:0.90±0.52μg·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹(133±71ng·mL⁻¹),H组:1.34±0.69μg·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹(206±106ng·mL⁻¹)。H组的苏醒时间更长:3.1±3.4小时,而L组为1.1±0.8小时,P<0.(摘要截断于400字) 5。发现在输注速率范围内药代动力学变量与剂量无关。平均值为t1/2β=4.4±1.5小时,CL=5.94±1.69mL·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹,Vd=3.13±1.07L·kg⁻¹。