Suppr超能文献

[肠球菌属中抗生素耐药性的检测。GPS-TA(生物梅里埃-维泰克)、Uniscept MIC-3(生物梅里埃-维泰克)与传统方法的比较]

[Detection of antibiotic resistance in Enterococcus sp. Comparison of GPS-TA (BioMérieux-Vitek), Uniscept MIC-3 (bioMérieux-Vitek) and conventional methods].

作者信息

Alamo I, González A

机构信息

Unidad de Microbiología, Hospital Nuestra Señora del Pino, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria.

出版信息

Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 1995 Nov;13(9):516-21.

PMID:8519833
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The treatment of severe enterococcus infections requires synergism of a beta-lactamic or glycopeptide and a aminoglycoside, but when resistance to first one or high-level resistance to aminoglycosides are present, synergism would be lost. We compared the adequacy of two commercially available systems to detect antibiotic resistance.

METHODS

We studied 158 isolates of Enterococcus sp., with high-level resistance to gentamicin (40 isolates) and streptomycin (89 isolates), resistance to ciprofloxacin (34 isolates), resistance to ampicillin (7 isolates) and with intermediate susceptibility to vancomycin (3 isolates). No one was beta-lactamase producer by Cefinase disk method. We use disk diffusion as reference technique to detect high-level streptomycin resistance. The susceptibility to the remainder antibiotics was studied by agar dilution method, according to NCCLS. We studied the accuracy of GPS-TA cards and Uniscept MIC-3 in relation to the degree of agreement with conventional means, following FDA criteria.

RESULTS

Essential agreement for MIC was less than 90 with MIC-3 for ampicillin (81.5%) and ciprofloxacin (71.3%). Categorical agreement rate was less than 90% (76.4%) and major error rate was higher than 3% (10.9%) with the use of MIC-3 for ciprofloxacin. Very major errors for ampicillin, vancomycin and ciprofloxacin were not produced by any system. The very major error rates for high level resistance to gentamicin and streptomycin with GPS-TA card were 5 and 15.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We do not recommend the use of the Uniscept MIC-3 panel with visual reading to detect susceptibility to ciprofloxacin. Detection of high levels of aminoglucoside resistance by GPS-TA card should be supplemented with conventional techniques because of the high rate of major error. Due to the low number of strains that have been studied, we can not assure the suitability of these systems to detect ampicillin or vancomycin resistance.

摘要

背景

严重肠球菌感染的治疗需要β-内酰胺类或糖肽类药物与氨基糖苷类药物协同作用,但当对前者耐药或对氨基糖苷类药物高水平耐药时,协同作用会丧失。我们比较了两种市售系统检测抗生素耐药性的准确性。

方法

我们研究了158株肠球菌分离株,其中对庆大霉素高水平耐药(40株)、对链霉素高水平耐药(89株)、对环丙沙星耐药(34株)、对氨苄西林耐药(7株)以及对万古霉素中介敏感(3株)。通过头孢菌素酶纸片法检测,无一株产β-内酰胺酶。我们采用纸片扩散法作为参考技术检测高水平链霉素耐药性。根据美国国家临床实验室标准委员会(NCCLS)的标准,采用琼脂稀释法研究对其余抗生素的敏感性。按照美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的标准,我们研究了GPS-TA卡片和Uniscept MIC-3与传统方法的符合程度的准确性。

结果

对于氨苄西林(81.5%)和环丙沙星(71.3%),MIC-3与MIC的基本符合率低于90%。使用MIC-3检测环丙沙星时,分类符合率低于90%(76.4%),主要错误率高于3%(10.9%)。任何系统均未产生氨苄西林、万古霉素和环丙沙星的极重大错误。GPS-TA卡片检测庆大霉素和链霉素高水平耐药的极重大错误率分别为5%和15.7%。

结论

我们不推荐使用视觉读数法Uniscept MIC-3板检测对环丙沙星的敏感性。由于主要错误率较高,GPS-TA卡片检测氨基糖苷类高水平耐药性时应辅以传统技术。由于所研究的菌株数量较少,我们无法确保这些系统检测氨苄西林或万古霉素耐药性的适用性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验