Doyle R L, Szaflarski N, Modin G W, Wiener-Kronish J P, Matthay M A
Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0130, USA.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Dec;152(6 Pt 1):1818-24. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.152.6.8520742.
A recent North-American-European Consensus Conference proposed new, uniform criteria for the definition of acute lung injury, in part to facilitate earlier identification of patients for clinical trials. However, these criteria have not been evaluated prospectively. We designed a prospective cohort study of 123 consecutive patients with acute lung injury prospectively identified on admission to the adult intensive care units of a tertiary care university hospital. The objectives were to determine if selection of patients using the new criteria for acute lung injury results in a significant change in the clinical characteristics, risk factors, or predictors of mortality when compared with prior studies of patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); and to determine if a quantitative index of the severity of acute lung injury has prognostic value in identifying nonsurvivors of acute lung injury. We used three methods: (1) prospective identification of patients with acute lung injury using a PaO2/FIO2 ratio < 300 and bilateral infiltrates on chest radiograph in the absence of left heart failure; (2) evaluation of the severity of lung injury using a four-point scoring system; and (3) stepwise logistic regression analysis to identify variables significantly associated with hospital mortality. Overall hospital mortality was 58%. Sepsis was the most common clinical disorder (50/123 or 41%) associated with the development of acute lung injury. Using the new definition for acute lung injury, 66 of the 123 patients were enrolled with a PaO2/FIO2 ratio between 150 and 299; 57 of the 123 patients had a PaO2/FIO2 < 150 at the time of entry into the study.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
最近召开的一次北美 - 欧洲共识会议提出了急性肺损伤定义的新的统一标准,部分目的是便于在临床试验中更早地识别患者。然而,这些标准尚未经过前瞻性评估。我们设计了一项前瞻性队列研究,纳入了123例连续的急性肺损伤患者,这些患者在一所三级医疗大学医院的成人重症监护病房入院时被前瞻性识别。目的是确定与先前关于成人呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的研究相比,使用急性肺损伤新标准选择患者是否会导致临床特征、危险因素或死亡率预测指标发生显著变化;并确定急性肺损伤严重程度的定量指标在识别急性肺损伤非幸存者方面是否具有预后价值。我们采用了三种方法:(1)使用动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分数值(PaO2/FIO2)< 300且胸部X线片显示双侧浸润影且无左心衰竭的情况前瞻性识别急性肺损伤患者;(2)使用四分制评分系统评估肺损伤的严重程度;(3)逐步逻辑回归分析以识别与医院死亡率显著相关的变量。总体医院死亡率为58%。脓毒症是与急性肺损伤发生相关的最常见临床病症(50/123或41%)。按照急性肺损伤的新定义,123例患者中有66例的PaO2/FIO2在150至299之间被纳入研究;123例患者中有57例在进入研究时PaO2/FIO2 < 150。(摘要截选至250词)