Lewis P J, Martino P, Mosconi G, Harding I
British Biotech, Cowley, Oxford, UK.
Chemotherapy. 1995 Sep-Oct;41(5):399-411. doi: 10.1159/000239373.
The efficacy of teicoplanin, a glycopeptide antibiotic, in endocarditis is controversial, with differences observed in the efficacies of the regimens used in clinical trials in the USA and Europe. This retrospective study examined the outcomes, efficacy and safety of mono- and combination antibiotic therapy using teicoplanin, particularly in cases of Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. A total of 115 patients, typically mixed endocarditis patients intolerant of previous antibiotic treatment, was enrolled at 29 centres throughout Europe. Combination therapy was more successful than monotherapy for treating native valve endocarditis (NVE) (93 vs. 85%, p > 0.05, NS) and for treating S. aureus NVE (84 vs. 50%, p > 0.05). Efficacies for prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) were similar (75 vs. 79%), while combination therapy was more successful in S. aureus PVE (100 vs. 67%) though the number of such patients was small (NS). Adverse events were reported by 24% of patients, with 19% probably or possibly related to teicoplanin. In 9% of cases the adverse event led to the termination of therapy. Teicoplanin was judged to be efficacious in mono- or combination therapy in streptococcal endocarditis, though augmentation with an aminoglycoside is recommended. The efficacy of teicoplanin demonstrated in enterococcal endocarditis represents a major therapeutic advance.
糖肽类抗生素替考拉宁治疗心内膜炎的疗效存在争议,在美国和欧洲进行的临床试验中所采用的治疗方案疗效有所不同。这项回顾性研究考察了使用替考拉宁进行单药及联合抗生素治疗的结果、疗效和安全性,尤其针对金黄色葡萄球菌心内膜炎病例。在欧洲各地的29个中心共招募了115例患者,这些患者多为对先前抗生素治疗不耐受的混合性心内膜炎患者。联合治疗在治疗自身瓣膜心内膜炎(NVE)方面比单药治疗更成功(93%对85%,p>0.05,无统计学意义),在治疗金黄色葡萄球菌NVE方面也是如此(84%对50%,p>0.05)。人工瓣膜心内膜炎(PVE)的疗效相似(75%对79%),联合治疗在金黄色葡萄球菌PVE中更成功(100%对67%),不过此类患者数量较少(无统计学意义)。24%的患者报告了不良事件,其中19%可能或很可能与替考拉宁有关。在9%的病例中,不良事件导致治疗终止。替考拉宁在链球菌性心内膜炎的单药或联合治疗中被判定有效,不过建议加用一种氨基糖苷类药物。替考拉宁在肠球菌性心内膜炎中所显示的疗效代表了一项重大的治疗进展。