• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison of three keratometry instruments.

作者信息

Tennen D G, Keates R H, Montoya C

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, Irvine 92717, USA.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 1995 Jul;21(4):407-8. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80530-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80530-5
PMID:8523284
Abstract

We compared the reliability of measurements of three keratometers and keratometry readings from a corneal topography system to determine if they were as accurate as the "gold standard" Javal-Schiotz keratometer. Same-day measurement of the steepest and flattest powers of the central 3 mm of the corneas of 200 eyes (100 patients) revealed no statistically significant difference in reliability between the newer keratometers and the Javal-Schiotz. In addition, the newer machines are more convenient and efficient in some clinical settings.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison of three keratometry instruments.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1995 Jul;21(4):407-8. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80530-5.
2
Comparison of keratometric values of healthy and diseased eyes measured by Javal keratometer, EyeSys, and PAR.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997 Apr;23(3):419-22. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(97)80187-3.
3
A comparison of the EH-270 corneal topographer with conventional keratometry.EH - 270角膜地形图仪与传统角膜曲率计的比较。
CLAO J. 1991 Jul;17(3):191-6.
4
Comparison of the Corneal Power Measurements with the TMS4-Topographer, Pentacam HR, IOL Master, and Javal Keratometer.使用TMS4角膜地形图仪、Pentacam HR眼前节分析系统、IOL Master光学生物测量仪和Javal角膜曲率计进行角膜屈光力测量的比较。
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr-Jun;22(2):233-7. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.151884.
5
Intraoperative PAR corneal topography system (CTS): comparison of its keratometric readings to manual keratometer, auto-keratometer, EyeSys Corneal Analysis system, and slit lamp PAR CTS in healthy eyes.术中PAR角膜地形图系统(CTS):健康眼其角膜曲率测量读数与手动角膜曲率计、自动角膜曲率计、EyeSys角膜分析系统及裂隙灯PAR CTS的比较
CLAO J. 2000 Jul;26(3):151-8.
6
Validation of Orbscan II posterior corneal curvature measurement for intraocular lens power calculation.用于人工晶状体屈光力计算的Orbscan II角膜后表面曲率测量的验证
Eye (Lond). 2004 Apr;18(4):357-60. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700659.
7
Comparison of reliability and repeatability of corneal curvature assessment with six keratometers.六种角膜曲率计角膜曲率测量的可靠性和可重复性比较
Clin Exp Optom. 2016 Nov;99(6):583-589. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12329. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
8
Comparison of different keratometers with the EyeSys videokeratoscope.不同角膜曲率计与EyeSys视频角膜曲率计的比较。
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998 Apr;76(2):158-64. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.1998.760207.x.
9
An evaluation of keratometry in 6-year-old children.6岁儿童角膜曲率测量评估
Cornea. 2006 May;25(4):383-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000214203.84081.ec.
10
Comparison of the accuracy and reproducibility of the keratometer and the EyeSys Corneal Analysis System Model I.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1992 Jul;18(4):342-7. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80068-5.

引用本文的文献

1
The Distribution of Keratometry in a Population Based Study.一项基于人群研究中的角膜曲率测量分布情况
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar 26;33(1):17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2019.06.004. eCollection 2021 Jan-Mar.
2
Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements Obtained by Aladdin Optical Biometer and Sirius Corneal Topography.阿拉丁光学生物测量仪与Sirius角膜地形图仪所测眼前节参数的比较
Turk J Ophthalmol. 2016 Dec;46(6):259-263. doi: 10.4274/tjo.60476. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
3
Keratometry with five different techniques: a study of device repeatability and inter-device agreement.
五种不同技术的角膜曲率测量:设备重复性和设备间一致性的研究。
Int Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug;34(4):869-75. doi: 10.1007/s10792-013-9895-3. Epub 2014 Feb 23.