Suppr超能文献

脉冲电刺激治疗膝关节骨关节炎

The treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee with pulsed electrical stimulation.

作者信息

Zizic T M, Hoffman K C, Holt P A, Hungerford D S, O'Dell J R, Jacobs M A, Lewis C G, Deal C L, Caldwell J R, Cholewczynski J G

机构信息

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 1995 Sep;22(9):1757-61.

PMID:8523357
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The safety and effectiveness of pulsed electrical stimulation was evaluated for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee.

METHODS

A multicenter, double blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial that enrolled 78 patients with OA of the knee incorporated 3 primary efficacy variables of patients' pain, patients' function, and physician global evaluation of patients' condition, and 6 secondary variables that included duration of morning stiffness, range of motion, knee tenderness, joint swelling, joint circumference, and walking time. Measurements were recorded at baseline and during the 4 week treatment period.

RESULTS

Patients treated with the active devices showed significantly greater improvement than the placebo group for all primary efficacy variables in comparisons of mean change from baseline to the end of treatment (p < 0.05). Improvement of > or = 50% from baseline was demonstrated in at least one primary efficacy variable in 50% of the active device group, in 2 variables in 32%, and in all 3 variables in 24%. In the placebo group improvement of > or = 50% occurred in 36% for one, 6% for 2, and 6% for 3 variables. Mean morning stiffness decreased 20 min in the active device group and increased 2 min in the placebo group (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed for tenderness, swelling, or walking time.

CONCLUSION

The improvements in clinical measures for pain and function found in this study suggest that pulsed electrical stimulation is effective for treating OA of the knee. Studies for longterm effects are warranted.

摘要

目的

评估脉冲电刺激治疗膝关节骨关节炎(OA)的安全性和有效性。

方法

一项多中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验,纳入78例膝关节OA患者,纳入患者疼痛、患者功能和医生对患者病情的整体评估这3个主要疗效变量,以及晨僵持续时间、活动范围、膝关节压痛、关节肿胀、关节周长和步行时间这6个次要变量。在基线和4周治疗期间记录测量值。

结果

在从基线到治疗结束的平均变化比较中,使用有源设备治疗的患者在所有主要疗效变量上的改善均显著大于安慰剂组(p < 0.05)。在有源设备组中,至少一个主要疗效变量从基线改善≥50%的患者占50%,两个变量改善≥50%的占32%,三个变量均改善≥50%的占24%。在安慰剂组中,一个变量改善≥50%的占36%,两个变量改善≥50%的占6%,三个变量改善≥50%的占6%。有源设备组的平均晨僵时间减少20分钟,安慰剂组增加2分钟(p < 0.05)。在压痛、肿胀或步行时间方面未观察到统计学上的显著差异。

结论

本研究中疼痛和功能临床指标的改善表明,脉冲电刺激对治疗膝关节OA有效。有必要进行长期效果研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验