Department of Physiology, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA ; Poliambulatorio del Secondo Parere, Modena, Italy;
Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:1289-93. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S35926. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
BACKGROUND: Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy has shown promising therapeutic effectiveness on bone- and cartilage-related pathologies, being also safe for management of knee osteoarthritis. AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of a PEMF device for management of knee osteoarthritis in elderly patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 33 patients were screened, and 28 patients, aged between 60 and 83 and affected by bilateral knee osteoarthritis, were enrolled in this study. They received PEMF therapy on the right leg for a total of three 30-minute sessions per week for a period of 6 weeks, while the left leg did not receive any treatment and served as control. An intravenous drip containing ketoprofen, sodium clodronate, glucosamine sulfate, calcitonin, and ascorbic acid, for a total volume of 500 mL, was administered during PEMF therapy. At baseline and 3 months post-PEMF therapy, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to assess knee pain and Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) was used to measure knee pain, stiffness and physical function. RESULTS: Changes in VAS and WOMAC scores were calculated for both knees as baseline minus post-treatment. A two sample Student's t-test, comparing change in knee-related VAS pain for PEMF-treated leg (49.8 ± 2.03) vs control leg (11 ± 1.1), showed a significant difference in favor of PEMF therapy (P < 0.001). A two sample Student's t-test comparing change in knee-related WOMAC pain, stiffness, and physical function for PEMF-treated leg (8.5 ± 0.4, 3.5 ± 0.2, 38.5 ± 2.08, respectively) vs control leg (2.6 ± 0.2; 1.6 ± 0.1; 4.5 ± 0.5 respectively), also showed a significant difference in favor of PEMF therapy (P < 0.001). No adverse reactions to therapy were observed. CONCLUSION: The present study shows that PEMF therapy improves pain, stiffness and physical function in elderly patients affected by knee osteoarthritis.
背景:脉冲电磁场(PEMF)疗法在骨和软骨相关疾病方面显示出有希望的治疗效果,并且对膝骨关节炎的管理也是安全的。
目的:本研究旨在探讨 PEMF 设备治疗老年膝骨关节炎患者的临床疗效。
材料和方法:共筛选了 33 例患者,其中 28 例年龄在 60 至 83 岁之间、双侧膝骨关节炎患者纳入本研究。他们接受了为期 6 周的右侧腿部 PEMF 治疗,每周共进行三次,每次 30 分钟,而左侧腿部未接受任何治疗作为对照。在 PEMF 治疗期间,静脉滴注含有酮咯酸、氯屈膦酸钠、硫酸氨基葡萄糖、降钙素和抗坏血酸的混合物,总量为 500 毫升。在基线和 PEMF 治疗后 3 个月,使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估膝关节疼痛,使用西部安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评估膝关节疼痛、僵硬和身体功能。
结果:计算了双侧膝关节的 VAS 和 WOMAC 评分的变化,即基线值减去治疗后值。采用两样本学生 t 检验,比较 PEMF 治疗腿(49.8 ± 2.03)与对照腿(11 ± 1.1)的膝关节相关 VAS 疼痛变化,结果显示 PEMF 治疗有显著差异(P < 0.001)。采用两样本学生 t 检验,比较 PEMF 治疗腿(8.5 ± 0.4、3.5 ± 0.2、38.5 ± 2.08)与对照腿(2.6 ± 0.2、1.6 ± 0.1、4.5 ± 0.5)的膝关节相关 WOMAC 疼痛、僵硬和身体功能变化,结果也显示 PEMF 治疗有显著差异(P < 0.001)。治疗过程中未观察到不良反应。
结论:本研究表明,PEMF 疗法可改善老年膝骨关节炎患者的疼痛、僵硬和身体功能。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016-4
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005-7
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012-4-13
Oncol Lett. 2025-4-25
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2012
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012-9-7
BMJ. 2012-7-30
Am J Ther. 2012-5
Hum Biol. 2011-8