• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诊室血压与动态血压:氨氯地平和缓释非洛地平的比较。丹麦多中心研究组

Office and ambulatory blood pressure: a comparison between amlodipine and felodipine ER. Danish Multicentre Group.

作者信息

Høegholm A, Wiinberg N, Rasmussen E, Nielsen P E

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Noestved County Hospital, Denmark.

出版信息

J Hum Hypertens. 1995 Aug;9(8):611-6.

PMID:8523374
Abstract

The anti-hypertensive efficacy and safety of extended-release (ER) felodipine (5, 10 or 20 mg) and amlodipine (5 or 10 mg) once daily were compared in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension in a double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, comparative study. A total of 118 patients were allocated to a 12-week, double-blind treatment with either felodipine ER (n = 57) or amlodipine (n = 61). The anti-hypertensive effect was evaluated by measuring office blood pressure (BP) at baseline and after 4, 6, 8 and 12 weeks, together with 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) at baseline, on day 1 of treatment and at the end of the study. The mean office BP changes from baseline to week 12 were -13.4 (+/- 15.7)/-11.8 (+/- 6.9) mmHg for felodipine ER (mean daily dose 11.2 mg) and -15.3 (+/- 17.0)/-12.9 (+/- 7.3) mm Hg for amlodipine (mean daily dose 7.4 mg). All BP reductions were significant (P < 0.01) with respect to time, but differences between treatment groups were not significant. The mean ambulatory BP changes from baseline to end of the study were -11.6 (+/- 5.2)/-10.0 (+/- 2.0) mmHg for felodipine ER and -16.3 (+/- 4.4)/-9.6 (+/- 3.0) mm Hg for amlodipine, both significant (P < 0.01). The fall in ambulatory SBP was significantly greater (P < 0.001) in the patients treated with amlodipine compared with felodipine ER whereas there was no difference between the groups with respect to ambulatory DBP. Both drgs were well tolerated with a withdrawl rate of 12% equally distributed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在一项双盲、双模拟、随机对照研究中,比较了缓释非洛地平(5、10或20毫克)和氨氯地平(5或10毫克)每日一次治疗轻至中度原发性高血压患者的降压疗效和安全性。共118例患者被分配接受为期12周的双盲治疗,其中非洛地平缓释片组(n = 57),氨氯地平组(n = 61)。通过在基线、治疗4、6、8和12周时测量诊室血压(BP),以及在基线、治疗第1天和研究结束时进行24小时动态血压监测(ABPM)来评估降压效果。非洛地平缓释片组(平均日剂量11.2毫克)从基线到第12周的平均诊室血压变化为-13.4(±15.7)/-11.8(±6.9)毫米汞柱,氨氯地平组(平均日剂量7.4毫克)为-15.3(±17.0)/-12.9(±7.3)毫米汞柱。所有血压降低在时间方面均有显著意义(P < 0.01),但治疗组之间的差异无统计学意义。从基线到研究结束,非洛地平缓释片组的平均动态血压变化为-11.6(±5.2)/-10.0(±2.0)毫米汞柱,氨氯地平组为-16.

相似文献

1
Office and ambulatory blood pressure: a comparison between amlodipine and felodipine ER. Danish Multicentre Group.诊室血压与动态血压:氨氯地平和缓释非洛地平的比较。丹麦多中心研究组
J Hum Hypertens. 1995 Aug;9(8):611-6.
2
Comparative effects of amlodipine and felodipine ER on office and ambulatory blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Danish Multicentre Group.氨氯地平和非洛地平缓释片对轻至中度高血压患者诊室血压和动态血压的比较效应。丹麦多中心研究组
J Hum Hypertens. 1995 Mar;9 Suppl 1:S25-8.
3
Comparative effects of felodipine ER, amlodipine and nifedipine GITS on 24 h blood pressure control and trough to peak ratios in mild to moderate ambulatory hypertension: a forced titration study.非洛地平缓释片、氨氯地平和硝苯地平控释片对轻至中度动态高血压患者24小时血压控制及谷峰比值的比较效应:一项强制滴定研究。
Can J Cardiol. 1998 May;14(5):682-8.
4
An 18-week, prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of amlodipine/ramipril combination versus amlodipine monotherapy in the treatment of hypertension: the assessment of combination therapy of amlodipine/ramipril (ATAR) study.氨氯地平/雷米普利联合用药与氨氯地平单药治疗高血压的18周前瞻性随机双盲多中心研究:氨氯地平/雷米普利联合治疗评估(ATAR)研究
Clin Ther. 2008 Sep;30(9):1618-28. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.09.008.
5
Randomised, double-blind, parallel study of the anti-hypertensive efficacy and safety of losartan potassium compared with felodipine ER in elderly patients with mild to moderate hypertension.氯沙坦钾与非洛地平缓释片治疗老年轻、中度高血压的疗效及安全性对比的随机双盲平行研究
J Hum Hypertens. 1995 Sep;9(9):765-71.
6
Low dosages of felodipine ER once daily as monotherapy in elderly hypertensive patients: effect on ambulatory blood pressure and quality of life.老年高血压患者每日一次低剂量非洛地平缓释片单药治疗:对动态血压和生活质量的影响。
J Hum Hypertens. 1996 Sep;10(9):613-8.
7
Efficacy of low felodipine dose monotherapy in mild-to-moderate hypertension: a comparison between office and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.低剂量非洛地平单药治疗轻至中度高血压的疗效:诊室血压与动态血压监测的比较
J Hum Hypertens. 1996 Sep;10 Suppl 3:S153-6.
8
Differential time effect profiles of amlodipine, as compared to valsartan, revealed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, self blood pressure measurements and dose omission protocol.通过动态血压监测、自我血压测量和剂量省略方案揭示的氨氯地平与缬沙坦相比的不同时间效应曲线。
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Aug;18(4):483-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2004.00269.x.
9
A factorial study of combination hypertension treatment with metoprolol succinate extended release and felodipine extended release results of the Metoprolol Succinate-Felodipine Antihypertension Combination Trial (M-FACT).美托洛尔琥珀酸盐缓释片与非洛地平缓释片联合治疗高血压的析因研究——美托洛尔琥珀酸盐-非洛地平抗高血压联合试验(M-FACT)结果
Am J Hypertens. 2006 Apr;19(4):388-95. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.10.007.
10
Efficacy and tolerability of extended-release felodipine and extended-release nifedipine in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.缓释非洛地平和缓释硝苯地平治疗轻至中度原发性高血压患者的疗效及耐受性
Clin Ther. 1994 Jul-Aug;16(4):634-46.