Suppr超能文献

[评估用于检测人类自然感染中肺炎支原体抗原引起的肱骨反应的传统和新一代检测方法。III. 酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)、补体结合试验和免疫电沉淀试验在肺炎支原体感染诊断中的应用——对比分析]

[Evaluation of conventional and new generation tests for testing the humeral response to Mycoplasma pneumoniae antigens in natural infection in humans. III Use of ELISA, complement fixation and immunoelectroprecipitation tests in diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections--comparative analysis].

作者信息

Rastawicki W

机构信息

Zakład Bakteriologii PZH w Warszawie.

出版信息

Med Dosw Mikrobiol. 1995;47(1-2):77-88.

PMID:8523972
Abstract

Agreement of the results of determining antibodies against M. pneumoniae was evaluated by the ELISA, complement fixation test (CFT) and immunoelectroprecipitation test (IEPT) in serum samples from 685 persons including 571 patients with respiratory tract infections and 114 clinically healthy subjects. Assuming the CF to be the reference test, a very high correlation exceeding 0.95 was found, on the basis of the calculated correlation coefficient, between the results of the CF and IEP tests and the CFT and ELISA in all immunoglobulin classes. The highest sensitivity (92.3%) was displayed by the ELISA in relation to the CF test when determining mycoplasmas antibodies of IgM and IgA + G + M classes and slightly lower sensitivity by the IEPT and ELISA when determining of IgG (83% and 82.1% respectively). The lowest sensitivity was displayed by the ELISA when determining mycoplasmal antibodies of IgA class (53.4%). Specificity of both the tests was high and exceeded 92%. Highest agreement of CFT and ELISA was obtained when detecting mycoplasmal antibodies in diagnostically significant titer in the M and A + G + M immunoglobulin classes (> 92%) while lowest agreement, although statistically significant, was obtained when detecting IgA antibodies (74.7%).

摘要

采用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)、补体结合试验(CFT)和免疫电沉淀试验(IEPT),对685份血清样本(包括571例呼吸道感染患者和114例临床健康受试者)中肺炎支原体抗体检测结果的一致性进行了评估。假设补体结合试验为参照试验,根据计算出的相关系数发现,补体结合试验和免疫电沉淀试验结果与所有免疫球蛋白类别中的补体结合试验和酶联免疫吸附测定结果之间存在超过0.95的极高相关性。在检测IgM以及IgA + G + M类别的支原体抗体时,酶联免疫吸附测定相对于补体结合试验显示出最高灵敏度(92.3%),而在检测IgG时,免疫电沉淀试验和酶联免疫吸附测定的灵敏度略低(分别为83%和82.1%)。在检测IgA类别的支原体抗体时,酶联免疫吸附测定显示出最低灵敏度(53.4%)。两种检测方法的特异性均较高,超过92%。在检测M和A + G + M免疫球蛋白类别中具有诊断意义滴度的支原体抗体时,补体结合试验和酶联免疫吸附测定的一致性最高(> 92%),而在检测IgA抗体时,一致性最低,尽管具有统计学意义,但为74.7%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验