Gil L, Adonis M, Cáceres D, Moreno G
Departamento de Bioquímica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago de Chile.
Rev Med Chil. 1995 Apr;123(4):411-25.
The influence of outdoor pollution on indoor air quality was studied in downtown Santiago(Bandera street). Carbon monoxide (CO), nicotine, particulate matter, respirable fraction (PM5) and total and carcinogenic polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were simultaneously monitored indoors and outdoors in restaurants, offices and other places. The levels of CO changed simultaneously outdoors and indoors (r = 0.89) specially during traffic rush hours, demonstrating the importance of outdoor infiltration into the indoor air quality and masking the contribution of other CO indoor sources. The maximum CO concentrations were over 800% and over 1000% higher indoors and outdoors respectively than the 9 ppm CO National Ambient Air Quality. The PM 5 concentrations were very high and showed no significant differences (p > 0.05) from indoors to outdoors, or between indoor levels in restaurants, offices and other places. Total and carcinogenic PAHs levels were also very high outdoors and indoors, outdoor levels being generally higher than those indoors and no significant; differences (p > 0.05) were found for the indoor levels between restaurants, offices and other places. Nicotine levels showed significant differences (p < 0.05) between indoor and outdoor levels. In addition, great differences (p < 0.05) in indoor levels, were found between offices and restaurants, and offices and other places. Among indoor sources cigarette smoke seems to be a minor source since nicotine concentrations, being 2.3 times higher in restaurants and other places than in offices, do not contribute to enhance significantly PM5 and total and carcinogenic HAPs in the first ones. These results suggest that in downtown Santiago, infiltration might be the main source of indoor pollution. This is supported by two evidences: a) coronene, a tracer of vehicle emissions was found in high concentration indoors and b) in restaurants (in which PAHs emissions might be higher indoor) a correlation coefficient of 0.987 for the indoor and outdoor concentrations of carcinogenic PAHs was found. Furthermore a survey asking for different symptoms and effects probably related to air pollution was made to people working in Bandera and in a rural area located 40 Km from Santiago. The results showed that excluding smoking as a confoundend factor, people working in Bandera showed a significantly greater (p < 0.05) risk of ill effects on their health than people working in the rural area.
在圣地亚哥市中心(班德拉街)研究了室外污染对室内空气质量的影响。在餐厅、办公室和其他场所同时对一氧化碳(CO)、尼古丁、颗粒物、可吸入颗粒物(PM5)以及总多环芳烃和致癌多环芳烃(PAHs)进行了室内和室外监测。CO水平在室外和室内同时变化(r = 0.89),特别是在交通高峰时段,这表明室外空气渗入对室内空气质量的重要性,并掩盖了其他室内CO源的贡献。CO的最高浓度在室内和室外分别比国家环境空气质量标准的9 ppm高出800%以上和1000%以上。PM5浓度非常高,从室内到室外以及在餐厅、办公室和其他场所的室内水平之间均无显著差异(p > 0.05)。总PAHs和致癌PAHs水平在室外和室内也都非常高,室外水平通常高于室内,并且在餐厅、办公室和其他场所的室内水平之间未发现显著差异(p > 0.05)。尼古丁水平在室内和室外之间存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。此外,在办公室与餐厅以及办公室与其他场所之间,室内水平存在很大差异(p < 0.05)。在室内来源中,香烟烟雾似乎是一个次要来源,因为尼古丁浓度在餐厅和其他场所比在办公室高2.3倍,但并未显著增加前者的PM5以及总PAHs和致癌PAHs。这些结果表明,在圣地亚哥市中心,空气渗入可能是室内污染的主要来源。这有两个证据支持:a)在室内发现了高浓度的屈,它是车辆排放的一种示踪物;b)在餐厅(其中PAHs室内排放量可能更高),致癌PAHs的室内和室外浓度的相关系数为0.987。此外,还对在班德拉以及距离圣地亚哥40公里的一个农村地区工作的人员进行了一项关于可能与空气污染相关的不同症状和影响的调查。结果表明,排除吸烟作为混杂因素后,在班德拉工作的人员比在农村地区工作的人员出现健康不良影响的风险显著更高(p < 0.05)。