Mitchell A A, Lesko S M
Slone Epidemiology Unit, School of Public Health, Boston University School of Medicine, Brookline, Massachusetts, USA.
Drug Saf. 1995 Jul;13(1):15-24. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199513010-00003.
Drugs are frequently made available for use before risks of rare but serious reactions have been identified and quantified. While this situation may be acceptable for drugs used to treat serious conditions, greater information on safety is needed for drugs used to treat less serious conditions, and particularly those medications available without prescription. Spontaneous reports and observational studies can provide useful data in most instances, but nonrandomised studies are inadequate in the presence of confounding by indication (i.e. when patients treated with a drug differ in their underlying risk of adverse outcome from patients given alternate treatments, independent of the effect of the drug). Such is the case in the US with regard to the use of paediatric ibuprofen as an antipyretic. In this setting, a rigorous and large randomised controlled trial is needed to provide valid and statistically stable risk estimates. A trial of this kind is a feasible way to develop clinically meaningful data on safety with respect to rare but serious adverse reactions.
在罕见但严重的反应风险被识别和量化之前,药物常常就已可供使用。虽然这种情况对于用于治疗严重病症的药物可能是可以接受的,但对于用于治疗不太严重病症的药物,尤其是那些无需处方即可获得的药物,需要更多关于安全性的信息。在大多数情况下,自发报告和观察性研究可以提供有用的数据,但在存在指征性混杂因素时(即当使用一种药物治疗的患者与接受其他治疗的患者在不良结局的潜在风险方面存在差异,且与药物的作用无关),非随机研究是不充分的。美国使用小儿布洛芬作为退烧药的情况就是如此。在这种情况下,需要进行一项严格且大规模的随机对照试验,以提供有效且在统计学上稳定的风险估计。这样的试验是生成关于罕见但严重不良反应的具有临床意义的安全性数据的可行方法。