Steurer J, Dür P, Russi E, Vetter W
Departement für Innere Medizin, Universitätsspital Zürich.
Pneumologie. 1995 Sep;49(9):492-5.
Hyperventilation syndrome is considered an established diagnosis if it is confirmed that the patient's complaints correlate with arterial hypocapnia. In the diagnostic criteria set up by a group in Nijmegen, paCO2 is determined indirectly by measuring the end tidal CO2. Values below 4 kPa measured at rest and 10 or more minutes after deliberate hyperventilation are classified positive diagnostic criteria for hyperventilation syndrome. However, it has not been proven that end tidal pCO2 agrees well with paCO2 during the entire manoeuvre. We performed simultaneous measurements of both parameters in 10 healthy non-smokers, before, during and after 3 minutes of deliberate hyperventilation. A comparison of the values employed for diagnosing a hyperventilation syndrome (during normal respiration before and 10 and more minutes after hyperventilation) yields a mean difference of 0.39 kPa according to the statistical computation described by Bland and Altman (limits of the range of agreement between 0.98 and -0.18). The end tidal CO2 values measured during the normal respiratory phase as well as 10 and more minutes after hyperventilation, agree well with the arterial values (the arterial values being slightly higher). During and shortly after hyperventilation the values obtained by both methods differ from one another, so that the exact degree of hypocapnia during a hyperventilation period cannot be assessed by measuring the end tidal CO2.
如果证实患者的症状与动脉血二氧化碳分压降低相关,则可确诊为过度通气综合征。在奈梅亨的一个研究小组制定的诊断标准中,通过测量呼气末二氧化碳间接测定动脉血二氧化碳分压。静息时以及刻意过度通气10分钟或更长时间后测得的值低于4 kPa被归类为过度通气综合征的阳性诊断标准。然而,尚未证实整个操作过程中呼气末二氧化碳分压与动脉血二氧化碳分压完全一致。我们对10名健康非吸烟者在刻意过度通气3分钟之前、期间和之后同时测量了这两个参数。根据布兰德和奥特曼描述的统计计算方法,对用于诊断过度通气综合征的值(正常呼吸时以及过度通气后10分钟及更长时间)进行比较,平均差异为0.39 kPa(一致性范围的界限在0.98和 -0.18之间)。在正常呼吸阶段以及过度通气10分钟及更长时间后测得的呼气末二氧化碳值与动脉值非常吻合(动脉值略高)。在过度通气期间和之后不久,两种方法测得的值彼此不同,因此无法通过测量呼气末二氧化碳来评估过度通气期间确切的低碳酸血症程度。