Wolfson S S, Landy M S
Psychology Department, New York University, NY 10003, USA.
Vision Res. 1995 Oct;35(20):2863-77. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00302-3.
Preattentive texture segregation was examined using textures composed of randomly placed, oriented line segments. A difference in texture element orientation produced an illusory, or orientation-defined, texture edge. Subjects discriminated between two textures, one with a straight texture edge and one with a "wavy" texture edge. Across conditions the orientation of the texture elements and the orientation of the texture edge varied. Although the orientation difference across the texture edge (the "texture gradient") is an important determinant of texture segregation performance, it is not the only one. Evidence from several experiments suggests that configural effects are also important. That is, orientation-defined texture edges are strongest when the texture elements (on one side of the edge) are parallel to the edge. This result is not consistent with a number of texture segregation models including feature- and filter-based models. One possible explanation is that the second-order channel used to detect a texture edge of a particular orientation gives greater weight to first-order input channels of that same orientation.
使用由随机放置的定向线段组成的纹理来研究前注意纹理分离。纹理元素方向的差异产生了一种虚幻的、或由方向定义的纹理边缘。受试者区分两种纹理,一种具有直的纹理边缘,另一种具有“波浪状”纹理边缘。在不同条件下,纹理元素的方向和纹理边缘的方向各不相同。虽然跨纹理边缘的方向差异(“纹理梯度”)是纹理分离性能的一个重要决定因素,但它不是唯一的因素。来自多个实验的证据表明,构型效应也很重要。也就是说,当纹理元素(在边缘的一侧)与边缘平行时,由方向定义的纹理边缘最强。这一结果与许多纹理分离模型不一致,包括基于特征和滤波器的模型。一种可能的解释是,用于检测特定方向纹理边缘的二阶通道会给予相同方向的一阶输入通道更大的权重。