Wolfson S S, Landy M S
Psychology Department, New York University, NY 10003, USA.
Vision Res. 1998 Feb;38(3):439-46. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00153-3.
Instantaneous texture discrimination performance was examined for different texture stimuli to uncover the use of edge-based and region-based texture analysis mechanisms. Textures were composed of randomly placed, short, oriented line segments. Line segment orientation was chosen randomly using a Gaussian distribution (described by a mean and a standard deviation). One such distribution determined the orientations on the left side of the image, and a second distribution was used for the right side. The two textures either abutted to form an edge or were separated by a blank region. A texture difference in mean orientation led to superior discrimination performance when the textures abutted. On the other hand, when the textures differed in the standard deviation of the orientation distribution, performance was similar in the two conditions. These results suggest that edge-based texture analysis mechanisms were used (i.e. were the most sensitive) in the abutting difference-in-mean case, but region-based texture analysis mechanisms were used in the other three cases.
研究了不同纹理刺激的瞬时纹理辨别性能,以揭示基于边缘和基于区域的纹理分析机制的使用情况。纹理由随机放置的短定向线段组成。使用高斯分布(由均值和标准差描述)随机选择线段方向。一种这样的分布确定图像左侧的方向,另一种分布用于右侧。两种纹理要么邻接形成边缘,要么被空白区域隔开。当纹理邻接时,平均方向上的纹理差异导致更好的辨别性能。另一方面,当纹理在方向分布的标准差上不同时,两种情况下的性能相似。这些结果表明,在邻接均值差异的情况下使用了基于边缘的纹理分析机制(即最敏感),但在其他三种情况下使用了基于区域的纹理分析机制。