Ishikawa A, Kimura T, Tomozane T, Watanabe T, Watanabe Y, Hashimoto M
Department of Preventive Dentistry, Okayama University Dental School.
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 1995 Sep;42(9):777-82.
This study was conducted to compare the effect of frequency of toothbrushing instruction using the Toothpick Method in a community periodontal health program. Two courses, one consisting of three monthly toothbrushing instructions and the other a single instruction session, were given to residents in a small town. Thirty-one subjects (mean age; 48.7 +/- 9.2) in the three-time instruction course and 40 subjects (mean age; 55.2 +/- 8.3) in the single instruction course participated in dental examinations. During the first visit, the subjects of the both groups attended a class for dental health education, and observed their dental plaque using a phase contrast microscope, and the condition of their teeth and periodontal tissue was recorded. They were instructed to brush their teeth by the Toothpick Method. After 1 year, the subjects of the both groups were examined and required to fill out a questionnaire. The percentage of sites with gingival redness and swelling significantly decreased after 1 month, 2 months and 1 year in the three-time instruction group. In the single instruction group, however, gingival redness and swelling did not change after 1 year. The percentage of sites with bleeding on probing significantly decreased in the both groups. The improvement ratio for the CPITN code was higher in the three-time instruction group than the other. The questionnaire showed that subjects in the three-time instruction group brushed their teeth more actively, and were more satisfied with the program than those in the single instruction group. These results show that the three-time instruction course was more effective than the single instruction course.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本研究旨在比较在社区牙周健康项目中使用牙签法进行刷牙指导的频率所产生的效果。在一个小镇上,为居民提供了两门课程,一门课程包含三次每月一次的刷牙指导,另一门课程为单次指导课程。参加三次指导课程的31名受试者(平均年龄48.7±9.2岁)和参加单次指导课程的40名受试者(平均年龄55.2±8.3岁)参与了牙科检查。在首次就诊时,两组受试者都参加了口腔健康教育课程,并用相差显微镜观察了他们的牙菌斑,并记录了牙齿和牙周组织的状况。他们被指导用牙签法刷牙。1年后,对两组受试者进行检查并要求填写问卷。在三次指导组中,1个月、2个月和1年后,牙龈红肿部位的百分比显著下降。然而,在单次指导组中,1年后牙龈红肿情况没有变化。两组中探诊出血部位的百分比均显著下降。三次指导组的社区牙周指数(CPITN)代码改善率高于另一组。问卷显示,三次指导组的受试者刷牙更积极,并且比单次指导组的受试者对该项目更满意。这些结果表明,三次指导课程比单次指导课程更有效。(摘要截短至250字)