Pfleiderer M, Falkner F G, Dorner F
Immuno AG Biomedical Research Center, Orth/Donau, Austria.
Protein Expr Purif. 1995 Oct;6(5):559-69. doi: 10.1006/prep.1995.1074.
Selection of an optimal promoter is necessary for efficient expression of foreign genes with vaccinia virus. Since a variety of powerful (homologous) vaccinia virus promoters and foreign (heterologous) promoter systems have been described for use in vaccinia, we have addressed the question of whether a general rule exists that allows the prediction of the optimal promoter/gene combination. We have compared the expression properties of four secreted proteins, the human blood clotting factor IX (FIX), the human blood glycoprotein Protein S (ProtS), the human von Willebrand factor (vWF), and the Hepatitis B virus (HBV) middle surface glycoprotein preS2, with proteins that were reported not to be secreted, the HBV large surface glycoprotein preS1 and the murine leukemia virus (MuLV) BM-5 Eco gag protein. In addition, we have included in our study an internal control protein, the vaccinia virus p11 protein, to monitor possible side effects of the promoter system used. Genes encoding the foreign proteins were placed either under control of a synthetic vaccinia virus early/late promoter (selP) or under control of the bacteriophage T7 promoter (T7/emc system). The secreted proteins were more efficiently expressed when fused to the homologous promoter. Direct comparison of the two promoters indicated that the expression level ranged between 1.4 (ProtS) and 3.9 (FIX)-fold higher with the selP than with the T7 promoter. In contrast, the cell-associated HBV preS1 was more efficiently expressed under the T7 promoter and the MuLV BM-5 Eco gag polypeptide was expressed equally well from both promoters. These data indicate that a careful prediction of optimal promoter/foreign gene combinations for the vaccinia virus expression system is possible. The choice of the optimal promoter/expression system is based on a simple classification scheme, discriminating secreted and nonsecreted proteins.
为了利用痘苗病毒高效表达外源基因,选择最佳启动子是必要的。由于已经描述了多种用于痘苗病毒的强大(同源)痘苗病毒启动子和外源(异源)启动子系统,我们探讨了是否存在一个通用规则来预测最佳启动子/基因组合的问题。我们比较了四种分泌蛋白,即人凝血因子IX(FIX)、人血纤蛋白原S(ProtS)、人血管性血友病因子(vWF)和乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)中表面糖蛋白前S2,与据报道不分泌的蛋白,即HBV大表面糖蛋白前S1和鼠白血病病毒(MuLV)BM-5 Eco gag蛋白的表达特性。此外,我们在研究中纳入了一种内部对照蛋白,即痘苗病毒p11蛋白,以监测所用启动子系统可能产生的副作用。编码外源蛋白的基因要么置于合成痘苗病毒早期/晚期启动子(selP)的控制之下,要么置于噬菌体T7启动子(T7/emc系统)的控制之下。当与同源启动子融合时,分泌蛋白的表达效率更高。两种启动子的直接比较表明,selP启动子的表达水平比T7启动子高1.4倍(ProtS)至3.9倍(FIX)。相比之下,细胞相关的HBV前S1在T7启动子控制下表达效率更高,而MuLV BM-5 Eco gag多肽在两种启动子控制下的表达水平相当。这些数据表明,对于痘苗病毒表达系统,仔细预测最佳启动子/外源基因组合是可行的。最佳启动子/表达系统的选择基于一个简单的分类方案,区分分泌蛋白和非分泌蛋白。