Suppr超能文献

使用国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)表格评估膝关节韧带损伤。

Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form.

作者信息

Hefti F, Müller W, Jakob R P, Stäubli H U

机构信息

Orthopädische Universitätsklinik, Kinderspital, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1993;1(3-4):226-34. doi: 10.1007/BF01560215.

Abstract

Various scoring systems have been proposed to quantify the disability caused by knee ligament injuries and to evaluate the results of treatment. None of these systems has found worldwide acceptance, mainly because all scoring systems attribute numerical values to factors that are not quantifiable, and then the arbitrary scores are added together for parameters not comparable with each other. For these reasons a group of knee surgeons from Europe and America met in 1987 and founded the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC). A common terminology and an evaluation form was created. This form is the standard form for all publications on results of treatment of knee ligament injuries. It is a concise one-page form. It includes a documentation section, a qualification section and a evaluation section. For evaluation there are four problem areas (subjective assessment, symptoms, range of motion and ligament examination). These are supplemented with four additional areas that are only documented but not included in the evaluation (compartmental findings, donor site pathology, X-ray findings and functional tests). The form can be used pre- and post-operatively and at follow-up. It has been specified that in any publication the minimum follow-up time for short-term results should be 2 years, for medium-term results 5 years and for long-term results 10 years. The largest part of the sheet is the qualification section. It is called "qualification" section rather than "scoring" section because no scores are given. Each parameter is qualified as "normal", "nearly normal", "abnormal" or "severely abnormal". This qualification is less subjective and emotional than "very good", "good", "fair" and "poor".(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

为了量化膝关节韧带损伤所导致的功能障碍并评估治疗结果,人们提出了各种评分系统。然而,这些系统均未获得全球范围内的认可,主要原因在于所有评分系统都将数值赋予了不可量化的因素,然后将这些随意给出的分数加总到无法相互比较的参数上。鉴于这些原因,一群来自欧美的膝关节外科医生于1987年齐聚一堂,成立了国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)。他们创建了一套通用术语和一份评估表格。该表格是所有关于膝关节韧带损伤治疗结果出版物的标准表格。它是一份简洁的单页表格,包括一个记录部分、一个分级部分和一个评估部分。评估有四个问题领域(主观评估、症状、活动范围和韧带检查),另外还有四个仅作记录但不纳入评估的领域(关节间 findings、供体部位病理、X 光检查结果和功能测试)。该表格可在术前、术后及随访时使用。规定在任何出版物中,短期结果的最短随访时间应为2年,中期结果为5年,长期结果为10年。表格最大的部分是分级部分,之所以称为“分级”部分而非“评分”部分,是因为不给出分数。每个参数被评定为“正常”“近乎正常”“异常”或“严重异常”。这种评定比“非常好”“好”“一般”和“差”更客观,少些主观色彩。(摘要截选至250词)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验