• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在全科医疗研究中运用焦点小组。

Using focus groups in general practice research.

作者信息

Barbour R S

机构信息

Public Health Research Unit, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 1995 Sep;12(3):328-34. doi: 10.1093/fampra/12.3.328.

DOI:10.1093/fampra/12.3.328
PMID:8536840
Abstract

Recent years have seen a growing recognition of the appropriateness of qualitative methods in family practice. This has been paralleled by an upsurge of interest in focus group discussions as a method. Drawing on the experience of using focus groups with general practice teams as one component of a multi-method study this paper explores emergent orthodoxies regarding the use of focus groups and reviews the contribution which this method can make to research in general practice.

摘要

近年来,人们越来越认识到定性方法在家庭医疗中的适用性。与此同时,作为一种方法,焦点小组讨论的兴趣也在激增。本文借鉴在多方法研究中将焦点小组用于全科医疗团队的经验,探讨了关于焦点小组使用的新兴正统观念,并回顾了该方法对全科医疗研究的贡献。

相似文献

1
Using focus groups in general practice research.在全科医疗研究中运用焦点小组。
Fam Pract. 1995 Sep;12(3):328-34. doi: 10.1093/fampra/12.3.328.
2
Quality of qualitative studies centred on patients in family practice: a systematic review.以家庭医疗中的患者为中心的定性研究质量:一项系统评价
Fam Pract. 2016 Dec;33(6):580-587. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw095. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
3
Qualitative methods in general practice research: experience from the Oceanpoint Study.
Fam Pract. 1996 Jun;13(3):310-6. doi: 10.1093/fampra/13.3.310.
4
Focus groups: a useful research method in general practice.焦点小组:全科医疗中的一种有用研究方法。
Med J Aust. 1993 May 3;158(9):622-5. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1993.tb137633.x.
5
A review of 5 existing guidelines for planning focus groups in GP research.
Aust Fam Physician. 1995 Feb;24(2):184-6.
6
Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups.定性研究中的数据收集方法:访谈与焦点小组。
Br Dent J. 2008 Mar 22;204(6):291-5. doi: 10.1038/bdj.2008.192.
7
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
8
Focus groups in family practice research: an example study of family physicians' approach to wife abuse.家庭医疗研究中的焦点小组:一项关于家庭医生处理妻子受虐问题方法的实例研究。
Fam Pract Res J. 1994 Mar;14(1):19-28.
9
Focus group research.焦点小组研究。
Nurs Stand. 2015 May 13;29(37):44-8. doi: 10.7748/ns.29.37.44.e8822.
10
[Issues involved in Dutch general practitioners' failure to request autopsy: report from three focus groups].[荷兰全科医生不要求进行尸检所涉及的问题:来自三个焦点小组的报告]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003 Jul 5;147(27):1315-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Parental Approach to the Management of Childhood Fever: Differences between Health Professional and Non-Health Professional Parents.父母对儿童发热管理的方法:保健专业人员父母与非保健专业人员父母之间的差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 20;16(20):4014. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16204014.
2
A Qualitative Study of Parents' Conceptualizations on Fever in Children Aged 0 to 12 Years.一项关于 0 至 12 岁儿童发热的父母概念化的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 16;16(16):2959. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162959.
3
Opinions on the use of technology to improve tablet taking in >65-year-old patients on cardiovascular medications.
J Int Med Res. 2018 Jul;46(7):2754-2768. doi: 10.1177/0300060518770578. Epub 2018 May 6.
4
Protocol for a feasibility study to inform the development of a multicentre randomised controlled trial of asthma-tailored pulmonary rehabilitation versus usual care for individuals with severe asthma.一项可行性研究方案,旨在为一项多中心随机对照试验的开展提供信息,该试验对比针对重度哮喘患者的哮喘定制肺康复治疗与常规治疗。
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 23;6(3):e010574. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010574.
5
Barriers to accurate diagnosis and effective management of heart failure have not changed in the past 10 years: a qualitative study and national survey.过去10年中,心力衰竭准确诊断和有效管理的障碍并未改变:一项定性研究和全国性调查。
BMJ Open. 2014 Apr 1;4(3):e003866. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003866.
6
Problems in sickness certification of patients: a qualitative study on views of 26 physicians in Sweden.患者疾病证明中的问题:对瑞典26名医生观点的定性研究
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2008;26(1):22-8. doi: 10.1080/02813430701747695.
7
Involving deprived communities in improving the quality of primary care services: does participatory action research work?让贫困社区参与改善初级保健服务质量:参与式行动研究是否有效?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Jun 18;7:88. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-88.
8
Missed appointments in primary care: questionnaire and focus group study of health professionals.基层医疗中的失约情况:针对医疗专业人员的问卷调查与焦点小组研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Feb;54(499):108-13.
9
Patients' opinions of the use of psychiatric case-finding questionnaires in general practice.患者对在全科医疗中使用精神科病例筛查问卷的看法。
Health Expect. 2002 Dec;5(4):282-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00186.x.
10
[Step by step in the design of a focus group-based study].
Aten Primaria. 2002 Apr 15;29(6):366-73. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(02)70585-4.