• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

焦点小组研究。

Focus group research.

作者信息

Traynor Michael

机构信息

Middlesex University, London, England.

出版信息

Nurs Stand. 2015 May 13;29(37):44-8. doi: 10.7748/ns.29.37.44.e8822.

DOI:10.7748/ns.29.37.44.e8822
PMID:25967446
Abstract

A focus group is usually understood as a group of people brought together by a researcher to interact as a group. Focus group research explicitly uses interaction as part of its methodology. This article summarises the practice of running focus groups, explores the nature of focus group data and provides an example of focus group analysis.

摘要

焦点小组通常被理解为由研究人员召集在一起进行群体互动的一群人。焦点小组研究明确将互动作为其方法的一部分。本文总结了开展焦点小组的实践,探讨了焦点小组数据的性质,并提供了一个焦点小组分析的示例。

相似文献

1
Focus group research.焦点小组研究。
Nurs Stand. 2015 May 13;29(37):44-8. doi: 10.7748/ns.29.37.44.e8822.
2
Preparing for and conducting focus groups in nursing research: part 2.护理研究中焦点小组的准备与实施:第2部分。
Br J Nurs. 2013;22(3):170-3. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2013.22.3.170.
3
Focus group interviews in nursing research: part 1.护理研究中的焦点小组访谈:第1部分。
Br J Nurs. 2013;22(1):16-9. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2013.22.1.16.
4
Quantitative and qualitative research data and their relevance to policy and practice.定量和定性研究数据及其与政策和实践的相关性。
Nurse Res. 2008;15(4):7-14. doi: 10.7748/nr2008.07.15.4.7.c6657.
5
Dilemmas of focus group recruitment and implementation: a pilot perspective.焦点小组招募与实施的困境:一个试点视角
Nurse Res. 2007;14(2):7-17. doi: 10.7748/nr2007.01.14.2.7.c6017.
6
Using focus groups in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 91.医学教育研究中焦点小组的运用:医学教育促进与研究协会指南第91号
Med Teach. 2014 Nov;36(11):923-39. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.917165. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
7
Data collection methods series: part 2: select the most feasible data collection mode.数据收集方法系列:第2部分:选择最可行的数据收集模式。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2009 Mar-Apr;36(2):129-35. doi: 10.1097/01.WON.0000347654.49228.44.
8
The learning curve: the advantages and disadvantages in the use of focus groups as a method of data collection.学习曲线:使用焦点小组作为数据收集方法的优缺点。
Nurse Res. 2004;11(4):79-88. doi: 10.7748/nr2004.07.11.4.79.c6217.
9
Court reporters: a viable solution for the challenges of focus group data collection?法庭速记员:焦点小组数据收集挑战的可行解决方案?
Qual Health Res. 2009 Jan;19(1):140-6. doi: 10.1177/1049732308327883.
10
Focus group methodology: explanatory notes for the novice nurse researcher.焦点小组方法:给新手护士研究者的解释性说明
Contemp Nurse. 2003 Jun;14(3):271-80. doi: 10.5172/conu.14.3.271.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Ethical Dilemmas and Coping Strategies in Nursing: A Focus Group Study of Nurses and Nursing Students.探索护理中的伦理困境与应对策略:一项针对护士和护生的焦点小组研究
Nurs Health Sci. 2025 Jun;27(2):e70082. doi: 10.1111/nhs.70082.
2
Young men with intellectual disabilities' perceptions of HPV and HPV vaccine: A qualitative study on how to communicate HPV vaccine information.智障青年对人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)及HPV疫苗的认知:关于如何传达HPV疫苗信息的定性研究
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025 Dec;21(1):2491857. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2491857. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
3
Building a Collaborative Translational Research Platform: Identifying Barriers and Enablers From Basic Research to Primary Healthcare.
构建协作性转化研究平台:识别从基础研究到初级医疗保健的障碍与促进因素。
Cureus. 2025 Feb 7;17(2):e78699. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78699. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Challenges and Alternatives to Evaluation Methods and Regulation Approaches for Medical Apps as Mobile Medical Devices: International and Multidisciplinary Focus Group Discussion.移动医疗设备类医疗 APP 的评估方法和监管途径面临的挑战与选择:国际与多学科焦点小组讨论。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 30;26:e54814. doi: 10.2196/54814.
5
Perspectives on Creating a Chronic Pain Support Line in Portugal: Results of a Focus Group Study among Patients and Healthcare Professionals.关于在葡萄牙创建慢性疼痛支持热线的观点:患者与医疗保健专业人员焦点小组研究的结果
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 2;13(17):5207. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175207.
6
[Transparency and Efficiency through Digital Healthcare? Results of a Survey of Generation Y].《数字医疗带来的透明度与效率?千禧一代的调查结果》
Gesundheitswesen. 2024 Jan;86(1):49-58. doi: 10.1055/a-2202-3289. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
7
Novel approaches to communication skills development: The untapped potential of qualitative research immersion.沟通技巧发展的新方法:定性研究沉浸式体验的未开发潜力。
PEC Innov. 2022 Aug 26;1:100079. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100079. eCollection 2022 Dec.
8
Perceived barriers to gluten-free diet adherence by people with celiac disease in Greece.希腊乳糜泻患者在坚持无麸质饮食方面所察觉到的障碍。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2023 May-Jun;36(3):287-292. doi: 10.20524/aog.2023.0798. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
9
Nurses' perceptions of the potential evolution of their role in antibiotic stewardship in nursing homes: a French qualitative study.护士对其在养老院抗生素管理中角色潜在演变的认知:一项法国的定性研究。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2023 Feb 1;5(1):dlad008. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlad008. eCollection 2023 Feb.
10
OLDER ADULTS' SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING EXPERIENCING THE EXERGAME "I AM DOLPHIN".老年人体验“我是海豚”健身游戏的主观幸福感。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2023 Dec;18(1):2170013. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2023.2170013.