• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实习医生结肠镜检查操作的技术熟练程度:一条学习曲线。

Technical proficiency of trainees performing colonoscopy: a learning curve.

作者信息

Marshall J B

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia 65212, USA.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 1995 Oct;42(4):287-91. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(95)70123-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0016-5107(95)70123-0
PMID:8536893
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We sought to provide an objective measure of the technical progress of trainees learning colonoscopy. GI fellows in our training program perform colonoscopy under supervision throughout their 2 years of fellowship.

METHOD

The frequency of fellows reaching the cecum in less than 30 minutes was determined by one endoscopy instructor during the last 7 months of their first year of training and during the last 7 months of their second year.

RESULTS

The mean success rate of reaching the cecum for seven first-year fellows was 54% (individual range, 25% to 86%). This compared with 86% for six second-year fellows (individual range, 73% to 93%) and with 97% for the endoscopy instructor when he did procedures without a fellow. First-year fellows during the 7-month "testing" periods believed they had reached the cecum in 5.7% of cases in which they had not. This was not a problem with second-year fellows. Counting colonoscopies done with all instructors in our program, fellows in this series each did an average of 149 colonoscopies during their first-year of training and 328 by the end of their second.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing proficiency in reaching the cecum occurs with experience over time, and continues even after completion of formal training. Individual trainees also seem to learn colonoscopy at different rates. Depending on how one defines competency, it is possible that the minimum threshold number for technical competency in colonoscopy of 100 procedures, as suggested by the ASGE, may be low.

摘要

背景与目的

我们试图提供一种客观的方法来衡量接受结肠镜检查培训学员的技术进步情况。在我们的培训项目中,胃肠病学专科住院医师在其两年的专科培训期间都要在监督下进行结肠镜检查。

方法

在第一年培训的最后7个月以及第二年培训的最后7个月,由一名内镜检查教员确定学员在不到30分钟内到达盲肠的频率。

结果

7名第一年住院医师到达盲肠的平均成功率为54%(个体范围为25%至86%)。相比之下,6名第二年住院医师的成功率为86%(个体范围为73%至93%),而内镜检查教员在没有住院医师协助的情况下进行操作时,成功率为97%。在7个月的“测试”期内,第一年住院医师中有5.7%的情况是他们认为自己已到达盲肠,但实际上并未到达。第二年住院医师不存在这个问题。计算本项目中所有教员指导下完成的结肠镜检查数量,本系列住院医师在第一年培训期间平均每人完成149例结肠镜检查,到第二年结束时平均每人完成328例。

结论

随着时间推移和经验积累,到达盲肠的熟练程度会提高,并且即使在正式培训结束后仍会继续提高。个体学员学习结肠镜检查的速度似乎也有所不同。根据对能力的定义方式,美国胃肠内镜学会建议的结肠镜检查技术能力最低阈值数量100例可能偏低。

相似文献

1
Technical proficiency of trainees performing colonoscopy: a learning curve.实习医生结肠镜检查操作的技术熟练程度:一条学习曲线。
Gastrointest Endosc. 1995 Oct;42(4):287-91. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(95)70123-0.
2
[How many procedures are necessary to achieve competency in colonoscopy?].[要达到结肠镜检查的熟练程度需要进行多少例操作?]
Arq Gastroenterol. 2004 Oct-Dec;41(4):211-4. doi: 10.1590/s0004-28032004000400002. Epub 2005 Mar 29.
3
Do breaks in gastroenterology fellow endoscopy training result in a decrement in competency in colonoscopy?在胃肠病学研究员内镜培训中休息是否会导致结肠镜检查能力下降?
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Sep;78(3):503-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.03.1331. Epub 2013 May 6.
4
Colonoscopy training in gastroenterology fellowships: determining competence.结肠镜检查培训在胃肠病学研究员中:确定能力。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Feb;71(2):319-24. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.05.012. Epub 2009 Jul 31.
5
Competency in esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a validated tool for assessment and generalizable benchmarks for gastroenterology fellows.食管胃十二指肠镜检查能力:一种经过验证的评估工具,可为胃肠病学研究员提供可推广的基准。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Oct;90(4):613-620.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.05.024. Epub 2019 May 20.
6
Fellowship Colonoscopy Training and Preparedness for Independent Gastroenterology Practice.结肠镜检查 fellowship 培训与独立胃肠病学实践准备
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan;50(1):45-51. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000376.
7
Early Splenic Flexure Intubation Competency Predicts Early Cecal Intubation Competency in Gastroenterology Fellows.早期脾曲插管能力可预测胃肠病学住院医师的早期盲肠插管能力。
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Nov;61(11):3155-3160. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4265-4. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
8
Impact of fellowship training level on colonoscopy quality and efficiency metrics. fellowship 培训水平对结肠镜检查质量和效率指标的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Aug;88(2):378-387. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.04.2338. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
9
An adequate level of training for technical competence in screening and diagnostic colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter evaluation of the learning curve.筛查和诊断性结肠镜检查技术能力的充分培训水平:学习曲线的前瞻性多中心评估
Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Apr;67(4):683-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.10.018. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
10
Assessment of competency in endoscopy: establishing and validating generalizable competency benchmarks for colonoscopy.内镜检查能力评估:建立并验证结肠镜检查可推广的能力基准。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Mar;83(3):516-23.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.041. Epub 2015 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Cold Snare Polypectomy in Pediatric Polyposis: A Multicenter Experience.儿童息肉病的冷圈套息肉切除术:多中心经验
Children (Basel). 2025 Feb 26;12(3):291. doi: 10.3390/children12030291.
2
Can my surgeon scope? Trends in endoscopy training volume and experience among general surgery residents in the United States: a nationwide analysis.我的外科医生可以进行内镜检查吗?美国普通外科住院医师内镜培训量和经验的趋势:全国性分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Mar;38(3):1491-1498. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10690-5. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
3
The Impact of Hospital Teaching Status on Colonoscopy Perforation Risk: A National Inpatient Sample Study.
医院教学状况对结肠镜检查穿孔风险的影响:一项全国住院患者样本研究。
Gastroenterology Res. 2020 Feb;13(1):19-24. doi: 10.14740/gr1234. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
4
Identification of cecum time-location in a colonoscopy video by deep learning analysis of colonoscope movement.通过结肠镜运动的深度学习分析识别结肠镜检查视频中盲肠的时间位置
PeerJ. 2019 Jul 29;7:e7256. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7256. eCollection 2019.
5
Colonoscopy education for surgical residents in Korea: a national survey of Korean Surgical Skill Study Group.韩国外科住院医师的结肠镜检查教育:韩国外科技能研究组的全国性调查
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2018 Sep;95(3):121-128. doi: 10.4174/astr.2018.95.3.121. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
6
Who Performs Colonoscopy? Workforce Trends Over Space and Time.谁来进行结肠镜检查?劳动力的时空趋势。
J Rural Health. 2018 Mar;34(2):138-147. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12286. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
7
Objective assessment of colonoscope manipulation skills in colonoscopy training.结肠镜操作技能的客观评估在结肠镜检查培训中。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018 Jan;13(1):105-114. doi: 10.1007/s11548-017-1676-4. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
8
Education and Training Guidelines for the Board of the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.韩国胃肠内镜学会理事会教育与培训指南
Clin Endosc. 2017 Jul;50(4):345-356. doi: 10.5946/ce.2017.106. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
9
The efficacy of training insertion skill on a physical model colonoscopy simulator.在物理模型结肠镜模拟器上训练插入技能的效果。
Endosc Int Open. 2016 Dec;4(12):E1252-E1260. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-114773. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
10
Automatic and unbiased assessment of competence in colonoscopy: exploring validity of the Colonoscopy Progression Score (CoPS).结肠镜检查能力的自动且无偏倚评估:探索结肠镜检查进展评分(CoPS)的有效性。
Endosc Int Open. 2016 Dec;4(12):E1238-E1243. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-118226. Epub 2016 Nov 17.