• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尼龙和聚丙烯缝线在微静脉血栓形成模型中的比较。

Comparison of nylon and polypropylene sutures in a microvenous thrombosis model.

作者信息

Ustüner T E, Zhang F, Lineaweaver W C

机构信息

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305, USA.

出版信息

Microsurgery. 1995;16(8):533-5. doi: 10.1002/micr.1920160805.

DOI:10.1002/micr.1920160805
PMID:8538429
Abstract

Thrombosis rates of femoral end-to-end microvenous anastomoses with nylon and polypropylene sutures (9-0 suture, 70 mu needle) were compared in a microvenous thrombosis model. The vessel injuries were produced during anastomosis by using a suture with a knot 1 cm from the needle. Anastomotic thrombosis rates were assessed by visual inspection and strip test at 24 hr postoperatively. Low thrombosis rates (0% and 20%, respectively) of anastomoses with both unknotted nylon and unknotted polypropylene sutures were obtained. Anastomoses with knotted nylon and polypropylene sutures resulted in 65% and 45% thrombosis rates, respectively. Statistical analyses showed that there were no significant differences between thrombosis rates, both in anastomosis performance with unknotted nylon and polypropylene sutures (P > 0.05) and with knotted nylon and polypropylene sutures (P > 0.05), while there were significant differences between the thrombosis rate using unknotted sutures and knotted sutures (P < 0.01). It was concluded that vascular injury, not suture material, is the main factor leading to thrombosis in this model.

摘要

在一个微静脉血栓形成模型中,比较了使用尼龙和聚丙烯缝线(9-0缝线,70μm针)进行股静脉端端微血管吻合的血栓形成率。在吻合过程中,通过使用距针1cm处带有结的缝线造成血管损伤。术后24小时通过肉眼检查和条带试验评估吻合口血栓形成率。未打结的尼龙和未打结的聚丙烯缝线吻合的血栓形成率较低(分别为0%和20%)。打结的尼龙和聚丙烯缝线吻合的血栓形成率分别为65%和45%。统计分析表明,未打结的尼龙和聚丙烯缝线吻合的血栓形成率之间(P>0.05)以及打结的尼龙和聚丙烯缝线吻合的血栓形成率之间(P>0.05)均无显著差异,而使用未打结缝线和打结缝线的血栓形成率之间存在显著差异(P<0.01)。得出的结论是,在该模型中,血管损伤而非缝线材料是导致血栓形成的主要因素。

相似文献

1
Comparison of nylon and polypropylene sutures in a microvenous thrombosis model.尼龙和聚丙烯缝线在微静脉血栓形成模型中的比较。
Microsurgery. 1995;16(8):533-5. doi: 10.1002/micr.1920160805.
2
Microvenous thrombosis rates following anastomosis with vein grafting and a knotted suture.采用静脉移植和打结缝合进行吻合后的微静脉血栓形成率。
Microsurgery. 1995;16(8):528-32. doi: 10.1002/micr.1920160804.
3
Comparison of 10-0 polypropylene and 10-0 nylon sutures in rat arterial anastomosis.
Microsurgery. 1993;14(5):328-33. doi: 10.1002/micr.1920140508.
4
Experimental microvenous thrombosis following anastomosis with a knotted suture.采用打结缝线吻合后的实验性微静脉血栓形成。
Microsurgery. 1995;16(2):98-102. doi: 10.1002/micr.1920160211.
5
Microvascular anastomoses in growing vessels: a long-term evaluation of nonabsorbable suture materials.生长中血管的微血管吻合术:不可吸收缝合材料的长期评估
J Reconstr Microsurg. 1993 May;9(3):183-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1006643.
6
Microvenous grafts to arterial defects. The use of mechanical or suture anastomoses.用于动脉缺损的微静脉移植物。机械吻合或缝合吻合的应用。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989 Aug;115(8):970-6. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1989.01860320080023.
7
Primary vascular anastomosis in growing pigs: comparison of polypropylene and polyglycolic acid sutures.生长猪的原发性血管吻合术:聚丙烯缝线与聚乙醇酸缝线的比较
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1981 Jun;81(6):921-7.
8
Some biomechanical considerations of polytetrafluoroethylene sutures.聚四氟乙烯缝线的一些生物力学考量
Arch Surg. 1990 May;125(5):647-50. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1990.01410170095020.
9
Absorbable polydioxanone suture for venous anastomoses: experimental studies using venography and transluminal angioscopy.
Eur J Vasc Surg. 1987 Oct;1(5):319-25. doi: 10.1016/s0950-821x(87)80059-2.
10
Testing of Direct Neurorrhaphy Strain.直接神经缝合张力测试
J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Jul;44(7):615.e1-615.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Oct 23.