Montserrat J M, Alarcón A, Lloberes P, Ballester E, Fornas C, Rodriguez-Roisin R
Servei de Pneumologia i Al.lèrgia Respiratòria, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain.
Thorax. 1995 Sep;50(9):969-71. doi: 10.1136/thx.50.9.969.
The increased demand of full polysomnographic studies, not only for diagnostic purposes but also for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration, has produced long waiting lists. Simpler methods are therefore needed to avoid having to refer all patients for full polysomnography. The hypothesis that CPAP therapy for the sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome (SAHS) can be performed exclusively on the basis of recording night time respiratory variables was tested.
The level of CPAP in a group of 41 patients (three women) of mean (SD) age 52 (10) years, body mass index 31.5 (4.4) kg/m2, and apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI) 53(16) events/hour was measured. During a two week period CPAP titration was performed in a random order in two settings: (1) in the sleep laboratory using full polysomnography; and (2) in the respiratory ward using equipment which continuously recorded and displayed pulse oximetry, airflow, chest and abdominal motion, and body position. The level of CPAP was increased progressively until apnoea, hypopnoea, snoring, and thoraco-abdominal paradox disappeared.
No differences in CPAP levels (9.34(2.2) versus 9.68 (2.1) cm H2O) were found between full polysomnography and night time respiratory recordings. The accuracy of the measurement of both procedures showed good agreement. Only one patient showed a significant difference in CPAP level requirements between the two methods.
Night time respiratory recording is sufficient to permit a reasonable choice of CPAP levels to abolish all the respiratory disturbances in most of the patients studied.
全夜多导睡眠图检查的需求不断增加,不仅用于诊断目的,还用于持续气道正压通气(CPAP)滴定,这导致了漫长的等待名单。因此,需要更简单的方法来避免将所有患者都送去进行全夜多导睡眠图检查。我们对仅基于夜间呼吸变量记录来进行睡眠呼吸暂停/低通气综合征(SAHS)的CPAP治疗这一假设进行了测试。
测量了一组41例患者(3名女性)的CPAP水平,这些患者的平均(标准差)年龄为52(10)岁,体重指数为31.5(4.4)kg/m²,呼吸暂停/低通气指数(AHI)为53(16)次/小时。在两周的时间内,以随机顺序在两种环境中进行CPAP滴定:(1)在睡眠实验室使用全夜多导睡眠图;(2)在呼吸病房使用持续记录和显示脉搏血氧饱和度、气流、胸部和腹部运动以及体位的设备。CPAP水平逐渐升高,直到呼吸暂停、低通气、打鼾和胸腹矛盾运动消失。
全夜多导睡眠图和夜间呼吸记录之间的CPAP水平没有差异(9.34(2.2)对9.68(2.1)cm H₂O)。两种方法测量的准确性显示出良好的一致性。只有一名患者在两种方法之间的CPAP水平要求上存在显著差异。
夜间呼吸记录足以在大多数研究患者中合理选择CPAP水平以消除所有呼吸紊乱。