Suppr超能文献

右脑或左脑血管意外患者在运动和过程技能评估上的差异。

Differences between persons with right or left cerebral vascular accident on the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills.

作者信息

Bernspång B, Fisher A G

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, University Hospital of Northern Sweden, Umeå.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 Dec;76(12):1144-51. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80124-3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Persons with right and left cerebral vascular accident (RCVA and LCVA) differ in terms of discrete impairments, but there is limited information with regard to how such impairments translate into differences in disability. The following hypotheses were tested: (1) persons with stroke have lower instrumental or domestic activities of daily living (IADL) ability than do matched nondisabled controls, (2) persons with RCVA do not differ from persons with LCVA in IADL ability, and (3) persons with RCVA and LCVA differ in specific motor and process skills that affect IADL performance.

DESIGN

Descriptive comparison.

SETTING

Subjects were tested in settings where rehabilitation services were received (home or clinic).

SUBJECTS

71 persons with RCVA, 76 persons with LCVA, and 83 community-living nondisabled individuals drawn from the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) database, matched for age, gender, and number of tasks performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

AMPS, designed to measure type and severity of impairments manifested in the context of IADL performance. The AMPS was administered to all subjects in accordance with standardized testing procedures.

RESULTS

The two stroke groups did not differ significantly in IADL ability, but both stroke groups had significantly lower IADL performance than did the nondisabled subjects. On the AMPS motor scale, persons with RCVA demonstrated greater impairment in pacing, transporting, and coordinating two body parts. Persons with LCVA demonstrated greater impairments in calibrating movements. No differences were found between the two groups in AMPS process skills.

CONCLUSIONS

Persons with RCVA and LCVA have hemisphere-specific differences in motor impairments, but do not differ significantly in IADL ability.

摘要

目的

右脑和左脑血管意外(RCVA和LCVA)患者在具体损伤方面存在差异,但关于这些损伤如何转化为残疾差异的信息有限。对以下假设进行了检验:(1)中风患者的工具性或日常生活活动(IADL)能力低于匹配的非残疾对照组;(2)RCVA患者与LCVA患者在IADL能力上没有差异;(3)RCVA和LCVA患者在影响IADL表现的特定运动和操作技能方面存在差异。

设计

描述性比较。

地点

在接受康复服务的场所(家中或诊所)对受试者进行测试。

受试者

从运动和操作技能评估(AMPS)数据库中选取71名RCVA患者、76名LCVA患者和83名社区生活的非残疾个体,根据年龄、性别和执行任务的数量进行匹配。

主要结局指标

AMPS,旨在测量在IADL表现背景下出现的损伤类型和严重程度。按照标准化测试程序对所有受试者进行AMPS测试。

结果

两个中风组在IADL能力上没有显著差异,但两个中风组的IADL表现均显著低于非残疾受试者。在AMPS运动量表上,RCVA患者在节奏、移动和协调两个身体部位方面表现出更大的损伤。LCVA患者在校准动作方面表现出更大的损伤。两组在AMPS操作技能方面没有差异。

结论

RCVA和LCVA患者在运动损伤方面存在半球特异性差异,但在IADL能力上没有显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验