Monés J, Carrio I, Sainz S, Berná L, Clavé P, Liszkay M, Roca M, Vilardell F
Servicio de Patologia Digestiva, Hospital de la Sante Crei i Sant Pau, Universitat Autónoma Barcelona, Spain.
Eur J Nucl Med. 1995 Oct;22(10):1123-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00800593.
The aim of this study was to assess the gastric emptying rate of two antacids using an scintigraphic technique and simultaneous monitoring of gastric pH in 16 healthy male volunteers. Ten ml of Talcid (hydrotalcite 1 g) and Maalox (Mg-Al-hydroxide), with a similar neutralization capacity, were labelled with technetium-99m using a pyrophosphate bridge. Labelled antacids were given on separate days (within 2 weeks), 1 h after a standard meal. Intragastric pH was measured for at least 4 h, using ambulatory pH-metry with a dual-crystant antimony catheter. Continuous monitoring was started 1 h prior to the meal (baseline) and lasted 3 h (post-prandial, post-antacid and final periods). The antacid capacity of labelled and unlabelled antacids was similar. The mean percentages of antacids retained in the stomach fitted a linear model. The mean half-emptying time of Talcid was 63.9 +/- 27.9 min, while that of Maalox was 57.3 +/- 23.9 min (P = NS). The recordings of gastric pH (mean values of pH for each period) showed a similar profile for both antacids. The mean pH (Maalox vs Talcid) was 1.69 vs 2.07 in the baseline period, 1.95 vs 1.93 in the post-prandial period, 1.79 vs 1.15 in the post-antacid period (P = NS) and 0.4 vs 0.52 in the final period (P < 0.05 vs prior periods). In conclusion, the gastric emptying of Talcid and Maalox was similar and pH profiles were parallel and remained unchanged for the two antacids within the first hour of intake. A significant decrease in pH was observed 1 h after intake of the antacids, suggesting a possible rebound effect.
本研究旨在采用闪烁扫描技术并同时监测16名健康男性志愿者的胃内pH值,评估两种抗酸剂的胃排空率。使用焦磷酸盐桥将10毫升具有相似中和能力的达喜(铝碳酸镁1克)和胃仙-U(氢氧化镁铝)用锝-99m进行标记。标记后的抗酸剂在不同日期(两周内)于标准餐后1小时给予。使用带有双晶体锑导管的动态pH测量法测量胃内pH值至少4小时。连续监测在餐前1小时(基线)开始,持续3小时(餐后、服用抗酸剂后和最终阶段)。标记和未标记抗酸剂的抗酸能力相似。抗酸剂在胃内保留的平均百分比符合线性模型。达喜的平均半排空时间为63.9±27.9分钟,而胃仙-U的平均半排空时间为57.3±23.9分钟(P=无显著性差异)。两种抗酸剂的胃pH值记录(各阶段pH值的平均值)显示出相似的曲线。基线期的平均pH值(胃仙-U对达喜)为1.69对2.07,餐后阶段为1.95对1.93,服用抗酸剂后阶段为1.79对1.15(P=无显著性差异),最终阶段为0.4对0.52(与之前阶段相比P<0.05)。总之,达喜和胃仙-U的胃排空情况相似,pH曲线平行,且在摄入后的第一小时内两种抗酸剂的情况保持不变。服用抗酸剂1小时后观察到pH值显著下降,提示可能存在反跳效应。