Suppr超能文献

美罗培南在住院儿童中的安全性和有效性:与头孢噻肟单独使用以及与甲硝唑或阿米卡星联合使用的随机对照研究。美罗培南儿科研究组

Safety and efficacy of meropenem in hospitalised children: randomised comparison with cefotaxime, alone and combined with metronidazole or amikacin. Meropenem Paediatric Study Group.

作者信息

Schuler D

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Semmelweis Medical University, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Jul;36 Suppl A:99-108. doi: 10.1093/jac/36.suppl_a.99.

Abstract

In this multicentre, randomised study of 170 children hospitalised with bacterial infections, meropenem (10 to 20 mg/kg every 8 h) was found to be as effective and as well tolerated as cefotaxime (100 to 150 mg/kg/day), with or without amikacin or metronidazole. Most drug-related adverse events were mild and self-limiting. Neither regimen was associated with seizures. The overall incidence of clinically significant laboratory changes was similar in the two treatment groups. Satisfactory clinical responses were obtained in 94/96 (98%) patients treated with meropenem monotherapy and 43/46 (93%) children treated with cefotaxime regimens, while satisfactory bacteriological responses were obtained in 25/28 (89%) and 9/10 (90%) patients, respectively. Meropenem monotherapy appears to be a well-tolerated and effective drug for paediatric infections.

摘要

在这项针对170名因细菌感染住院的儿童的多中心随机研究中,发现美罗培南(每8小时10至20mg/kg)与头孢噻肟(100至150mg/kg/天)联合或不联合阿米卡星或甲硝唑相比,疗效相当且耐受性良好。大多数与药物相关的不良事件为轻度且可自行缓解。两种治疗方案均未引发癫痫。两个治疗组中具有临床意义的实验室指标变化的总体发生率相似。接受美罗培南单药治疗的94/96(98%)名患者和接受头孢噻肟治疗方案的43/46(93%)名儿童获得了满意的临床反应,而分别有25/28(89%)和9/10(90%)名患者获得了满意的细菌学反应。美罗培南单药治疗似乎是一种耐受性良好且有效的儿科感染用药。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验