• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美罗培南在住院儿童中的安全性和有效性:与头孢噻肟单独使用以及与甲硝唑或阿米卡星联合使用的随机对照研究。美罗培南儿科研究组

Safety and efficacy of meropenem in hospitalised children: randomised comparison with cefotaxime, alone and combined with metronidazole or amikacin. Meropenem Paediatric Study Group.

作者信息

Schuler D

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Semmelweis Medical University, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Jul;36 Suppl A:99-108. doi: 10.1093/jac/36.suppl_a.99.

DOI:10.1093/jac/36.suppl_a.99
PMID:8543503
Abstract

In this multicentre, randomised study of 170 children hospitalised with bacterial infections, meropenem (10 to 20 mg/kg every 8 h) was found to be as effective and as well tolerated as cefotaxime (100 to 150 mg/kg/day), with or without amikacin or metronidazole. Most drug-related adverse events were mild and self-limiting. Neither regimen was associated with seizures. The overall incidence of clinically significant laboratory changes was similar in the two treatment groups. Satisfactory clinical responses were obtained in 94/96 (98%) patients treated with meropenem monotherapy and 43/46 (93%) children treated with cefotaxime regimens, while satisfactory bacteriological responses were obtained in 25/28 (89%) and 9/10 (90%) patients, respectively. Meropenem monotherapy appears to be a well-tolerated and effective drug for paediatric infections.

摘要

在这项针对170名因细菌感染住院的儿童的多中心随机研究中,发现美罗培南(每8小时10至20mg/kg)与头孢噻肟(100至150mg/kg/天)联合或不联合阿米卡星或甲硝唑相比,疗效相当且耐受性良好。大多数与药物相关的不良事件为轻度且可自行缓解。两种治疗方案均未引发癫痫。两个治疗组中具有临床意义的实验室指标变化的总体发生率相似。接受美罗培南单药治疗的94/96(98%)名患者和接受头孢噻肟治疗方案的43/46(93%)名儿童获得了满意的临床反应,而分别有25/28(89%)和9/10(90%)名患者获得了满意的细菌学反应。美罗培南单药治疗似乎是一种耐受性良好且有效的儿科感染用药。

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of meropenem in hospitalised children: randomised comparison with cefotaxime, alone and combined with metronidazole or amikacin. Meropenem Paediatric Study Group.美罗培南在住院儿童中的安全性和有效性:与头孢噻肟单独使用以及与甲硝唑或阿米卡星联合使用的随机对照研究。美罗培南儿科研究组
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Jul;36 Suppl A:99-108. doi: 10.1093/jac/36.suppl_a.99.
2
Antibiotic monotherapy with meropenem in the surgical management of intra-abdominal infections.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Jul;36 Suppl A:179-89. doi: 10.1093/jac/36.suppl_a.179.
3
Empirical monotherapy with meropenem in serious bacterial infections. Meropenem Study Group.美罗培南用于严重细菌感染的经验性单药治疗。美罗培南研究组。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Jul;36 Suppl A:145-56. doi: 10.1093/jac/36.suppl_a.145.
4
Carbapenems: monotherapy in intra-abdominal sepsis.碳青霉烯类药物:用于腹腔内脓毒症的单一疗法。
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1995;96:28-33.
5
Meropenem monotherapy versus combination therapy with ceftazidime and amikacin for empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic patients.美罗培南单药治疗与头孢他啶联合阿米卡星治疗对发热性中性粒细胞减少患者的经验性治疗
Ann Hematol. 1998 Feb;76(2):73-80. doi: 10.1007/s002770050366.
6
Meropenem monotherapy versus cefotaxime plus metronidazole combination treatment for serious intra-abdominal infections.
Infection. 1996 Nov-Dec;24(6):473-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01713053.
7
Safety and efficacy of meropenem in patients with septicaemia: a randomised comparison with ceftazidime, alone or combined with amikacin.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Jul;36 Suppl A:157-66. doi: 10.1093/jac/36.suppl_a.157.
8
Carbapenems in paediatrics.
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1995;96:38-44.
9
A multi-centre study to compare meropenem and cefotaxime and metronidazole in the treatment of hospitalized patients with serious infections.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997 May;39(5):631-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/39.5.631.
10
Monotherapy with meropenem versus combination therapy with ceftazidime plus amikacin as empiric therapy for fever in granulocytopenic patients with cancer. The International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche Maligne dell'Adulto Infection Program.美罗培南单药治疗与头孢他啶加阿米卡星联合治疗作为癌症粒细胞缺乏患者发热经验性治疗的比较。欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织国际抗菌治疗合作组及意大利成人恶性血液病研究组感染项目。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 May;40(5):1108-15. doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.5.1108.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving the efficacy for meropenem therapy requires a high probability of target attainment in critically ill infants and children.提高美罗培南治疗的疗效需要在危重症婴幼儿中实现高目标达成概率。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Oct 5;13:961863. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.961863. eCollection 2022.
2
Antibiotics for hospital-acquired pneumonia in neonates and children.新生儿和儿童医院获得性肺炎的抗生素治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 2;11(11):CD013864. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013864.pub2.
3
Beta lactam antibiotic monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside antibiotic combination therapy for sepsis.
β-内酰胺类抗生素单药治疗与β-内酰胺类-氨基糖苷类抗生素联合治疗败血症的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 7;2014(1):CD003344. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003344.pub3.
4
Safety and effectiveness of meropenem in infants with suspected or complicated intra-abdominal infections.美罗培南治疗疑似或复杂腹腔内感染婴儿的安全性和有效性。
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Dec;55(11):1495-502. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis758. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
5
Imipenem and meropenem: Comparison of in vitro activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical trials and adverse effects.亚胺培南和美罗培南:体外活性、药代动力学、临床试验及不良反应的比较
Can J Infect Dis. 1998 Jul;9(4):215-28. doi: 10.1155/1998/831425.
6
Meropenem: a review of its use in the treatment of serious bacterial infections.美罗培南:其在治疗严重细菌感染中的应用综述
Drugs. 2008;68(6):803-38. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200868060-00006.
7
Meropenem in neonatal severe infections due to multiresistant gram-negative bacteria.美罗培南用于治疗多重耐药革兰阴性菌所致新生儿严重感染。
Indian J Pediatr. 2001 Jan;68(1):15-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02728850.
8
Meropenem: an updated review of its use in the management of intra-abdominal infections.美罗培南:其在腹腔内感染管理中应用的最新综述
Drugs. 2000 Sep;60(3):619-46. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200060030-00010.
9
Meropenem: a review of its use in patients in intensive care.美罗培南:对其在重症监护患者中应用的综述
Drugs. 2000 Mar;59(3):653-80. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200059030-00016.
10
A comparison of the pharmacokinetics of meropenem after intravenous administration by injection over 2, 3 and 5 minutes.美罗培南在静脉注射2分钟、3分钟和5分钟后的药代动力学比较。
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 1997 Jul-Sep;22(3):193-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03189806.